Papakonstantinou, Theodoros; Salanti, Georgia; Mavridis, Dimitris; Rücker, Gerta; Schwarzer, Guido; Nikolakopoulou, Adriani (2022). Answering complex hierarchy questions in network meta-analysis. BMC Medical research methodology, 22(1), p. 47. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12874-021-01488-3
|
Text
s12874-021-01488-3.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (2MB) | Preview |
BACKGROUND
Network meta-analysis estimates all relative effects between competing treatments and can produce a treatment hierarchy from the most to the least desirable option according to a health outcome. While about half of the published network meta-analyses present such a hierarchy, it is rarely the case that it is related to a clinically relevant decision question.
METHODS
We first define treatment hierarchy and treatment ranking in a network meta-analysis and suggest a simulation method to estimate the probability of each possible hierarchy to occur. We then propose a stepwise approach to express clinically relevant decision questions as hierarchy questions and quantify the uncertainty of the criteria that constitute them. The steps of the approach are summarized as follows: a) a question of clinical relevance is defined, b) the hierarchies that satisfy the defined question are collected and c) the frequencies of the respective hierarchies are added; the resulted sum expresses the certainty of the defined set of criteria to hold. We then show how the frequencies of all possible hierarchies relate to common ranking metrics.
RESULTS
We exemplify the method and its implementation using two networks. The first is a network of four treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease where the most probable hierarchy has a frequency of 28%. The second is a network of 18 antidepressants, among which Vortioxetine, Bupropion and Escitalopram occupy the first three ranks with frequency 19%.
CONCLUSIONS
The developed method offers a generalised approach of producing treatment hierarchies in network meta-analysis, which moves towards attaching treatment ranking to a clear decision question, relevant to all or a subset of competing treatments.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Papakonstantinou, Theodoros, Salanti, Georgia, Nikolakopoulou, Adriani |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services |
ISSN: |
1471-2288 |
Publisher: |
BioMed Central |
Funders: |
[4] Swiss National Science Foundation |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
21 Feb 2022 09:28 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 16:09 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1186/s12874-021-01488-3 |
PubMed ID: |
35176997 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Clinically relevant question Evidence synthesis Indirect evidence Probabilistic ranking |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/165771 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/165771 |