Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency.

Bolormaa, Sunduimijid; MacLeod, Iona M; Khansefid, Majid; Marett, Leah C; Wales, William J; Miglior, Filippo; Baes, Christine F; Schenkel, Flavio S; Connor, Erin E; Manzanilla-Pech, Coralia I V; Stothard, Paul; Herman, Emily; Nieuwhof, Gert J; Goddard, Michael E; Pryce, Jennie E (2022). Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency. Genetics, selection, evolution, 54(1), p. 60. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12711-022-00749-z

[img]
Preview
Text
s12711-022-00749-z.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Sharing individual phenotype and genotype data between countries is complex and fraught with potential errors, while sharing summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is relatively straightforward, and thus would be especially useful for traits that are expensive or difficult-to-measure, such as feed efficiency. Here we examined: (1) the sharing of individual cow data from international partners; and (2) the use of sequence variants selected from GWAS of international cow data to evaluate the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for residual feed intake (RFI) in Australian cows.

RESULTS

GEBV for RFI were estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with 50k or high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), from a training population of 3797 individuals in univariate to trivariate analyses where the three traits were RFI phenotypes calculated using 584 Australian lactating cows (AUSc), 824 growing heifers (AUSh), and 2526 international lactating cows (OVE). Accuracies of GEBV in AUSc were evaluated by either cohort-by-birth-year or fourfold random cross-validations. GEBV of AUSc were also predicted using only the AUS training population with a weighted genomic relationship matrix constructed with SNPs from the 50k array and sequence variants selected from a meta-GWAS that included only international datasets. The genomic heritabilities estimated using the AUSc, OVE and AUSh datasets were moderate, ranging from 0.20 to 0.36. The genetic correlations (rg) of traits between heifers and cows ranged from 0.30 to 0.95 but were associated with large standard errors. The mean accuracies of GEBV in Australian cows were up to 0.32 and almost doubled when either overseas cows, or both overseas cows and AUS heifers were included in the training population. They also increased when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNPs, but with a smaller relative increase.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of RFI GEBV increased when international data were used or when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNP array data. This suggests that if direct sharing of data is not feasible, a meta-analysis of summary GWAS statistics could provide selected SNPs for custom panels to use in genomic selection programs. However, since this finding is based on a small cross-validation study, confirmation through a larger study is recommended.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health (DCR-VPH) > Institute of Genetics
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health (DCR-VPH)

UniBE Contributor:

Baes, Christine Francoise

Subjects:

500 Science > 590 Animals (Zoology)
600 Technology > 630 Agriculture

ISSN:

1297-9686

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

08 Sep 2022 10:30

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 16:23

Publisher DOI:

10.1186/s12711-022-00749-z

PubMed ID:

36068488

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/172743

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/172743

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback