The effects of time-restricted eating and weight loss on bone metabolism and health: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

Papageorgiou, Maria; Biver, Emmanuel; Mareschal, Julie; Phillips, Nicholas Edward; Hemmer, Alexandra; Biolley, Emma; Schwab, Nathalie; Manoogian, Emily N C; Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena; Aeberli, Daniel; Hans, Didier; Pot, Caroline; Panda, Satchidananda; Rodondi, Nicolas; Ferrari, Serge L; Collet, Tinh-Hai (2023). The effects of time-restricted eating and weight loss on bone metabolism and health: a 6-month randomized controlled trial. Obesity, 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1), pp. 85-95. Wiley 10.1002/oby.23577

[img]
Preview
Text
Papageorgiou_ObesitySilverSpring_2023.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (2MB) | Preview

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the impact of time-restricted eating (TRE) versus standard dietary advice (SDA) on bone health.

METHODS

Adults with ≥1 component of metabolic syndrome were randomized to TRE (ad libitum eating within 12 hours) or SDA (food pyramid brochure). Bone turnover markers and bone mineral content/density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed in the total population and by weight loss response.

RESULTS

In the total population (n = 42, 76% women, median age 47 years [IQR: 31-52]), there were no between-group differences (TRE vs. SDA) in any bone parameter. Among weight loss responders (≥0.6 kg weight loss), the bone resorption marker β-carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen tended to decrease after TRE but increase after SDA (between-group differences p = 0.041), whereas changes in the bone formation marker procollagen type I N-propeptide did not differ between groups. Total body bone mineral content decreased after SDA (p = 0.028) but remained unchanged after TRE (p = 0.31) in weight loss responders (between-group differences p = 0.028). Among nonresponders (<0.6 kg weight loss), there were no between-group differences in bone outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

TRE had no detrimental impact on bone health, whereas, when weight loss occurred, it was associated with some bone-sparing effects compared with SDA.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Rheumatology and Immunology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine > Centre of Competence for General Internal Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Schwab, Nathalie Christa, Aeberli, Daniel, Rodondi, Nicolas

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1930-7381

Publisher:

Wiley

Funders:

[4] Swiss National Science Foundation

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

17 Oct 2022 11:03

Last Modified:

16 Apr 2023 02:08

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/oby.23577

PubMed ID:

36239695

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/173763

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/173763

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback