Estimating the sample size of sham-controlled randomized controlled trials using existing evidence [version 2; peer review: 2 approved].

Siontis, Georgios; Nikolakopoulou, Adriani; Sweda, Romy; Mavridis, Dimitris; Salanti, Georgia (2022). Estimating the sample size of sham-controlled randomized controlled trials using existing evidence [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 11, p. 85. F1000 Research Ltd 10.12688/f1000research.108554.2

Preview	Text (version 2: 07 Nov 2022) Siontis_F1000Res_2022.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (634kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (version 1: 24 Jan 2022) 43d49e11-221b-4a44-8386-3e7ccf9c8e6e_108554_-_georgios_siontis.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (611kB) | Preview

Background: In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the power is often 'reverse engineered' based on the number of participants that can realistically be achieved. An attractive alternative is planning a new trial conditional on the available evidence; a design of particular interest in RCTs that use a sham control arm (sham-RCTs). Methods: We explore the design of sham-RCTs, the role of sequential meta-analysis and  conditional planning in a systematic review of renal sympathetic denervation for patients with arterial hypertension. The main efficacy endpoint was mean change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure. We performed sequential meta-analysis to identify the time point where the null hypothesis would be rejected in a prospective scenario. Evidence-based conditional sample size calculations were performed based on fixed-effect meta-analysis. Results: In total, six sham-RCTs (981 participants) were identified. The first RCT was considerably larger (535 participants) than those subsequently published (median sample size of 80). All trial sample sizes were calculated assuming an unrealistically large intervention effect which resulted in low power when each study is considered as a stand-alone experiment. Sequential meta-analysis provided firm evidence against the null hypothesis with the synthesis of the first four trials (755 patients, cumulative mean difference -2.75 (95%CI -4.93 to -0.58) favoring the active intervention)). Conditional planning resulted in much larger sample sizes compared to those in the original trials, due to overoptimistic expected effects made by the investigators in individual trials, and potentially a time-effect association. Conclusions: Sequential meta-analysis of sham-RCTs can reach conclusive findings earlier and hence avoid exposing patients to sham-related risks. Conditional planning of new sham-RCTs poses important challenges as many surgical/minimally invasive procedures improve over time, the intervention effect is expected to increase in new studies and this violates the underlying assumptions. Unless this is accounted for, conditional planning will not improve the design of sham-RCTs.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

44 since deposited on 05 Dec 2022
24 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item