Kjær, Maj-Brit Nørregaard; Meyhoff, Tine Sylvest; Sivapalan, Praleene; Granholm, Anders; Hjortrup, Peter Buhl; Madsen, Martin Bruun; Møller, Morten Hylander; Egerod, Ingrid; Wetterslev, Jørn; Lange, Theis; Cronhjort, Maria; Laake, Jon Henrik; Jakob, Stephan M; Nalos, Marek; Ostermann, Marlies; Gould, Doug; Cecconi, Maurizio; Malbrain, Manu L N G; Ahlstedt, Christian; Kiel, Louise Bendix; ... (2023). Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock. Intensive care medicine, 49(7), pp. 820-830. Springer 10.1007/s00134-023-07114-8
|
Text
s00134-023-07114-8.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC). Download (1MB) | Preview |
PURPOSE
To assess long-term outcomes of restrictive versus standard intravenous (IV) fluid therapy in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock included in the European Conservative versus Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy in Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial.
METHODS
We conducted the pre-planned analyses of mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L index values and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS), and cognitive function using Mini Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini MoCA) test at 1 year. Deceased patients were assigned numerical zero for HRQoL as a state equal to death and zero for cognitive function outcomes as worst possible score, and we used multiple imputation for missing data on HRQoL and cognitive function.
RESULTS
Among 1554 randomized patients, we obtained 1-year data on mortality in 97.9% of patients, HRQoL in 91.3%, and cognitive function in 86.3%. One-year mortality was 385/746 (51.3%) in the restrictive-fluid group versus 383/767 (49.9%) in the standard-fluid group, absolute risk difference 1.5%-points [99% confidence interval (CI) - 4.8 to 7.8]. Mean differences were 0.00 (99% CI - 0.06 to 0.05) for EQ-5D-5L index values, - 0.65 for EQ VAS (- 5.40 to 4.08), and - 0.14 for Mini MoCA (- 1.59 to 1.14) for the restrictive-fluid group versus the standard-fluid group. The results for survivors only were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Among adult ICU patients with septic shock, restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy resulted in similar survival, HRQoL, and cognitive function at 1 year, but clinically important differences could not be ruled out.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic of Intensive Care |
UniBE Contributor: |
Jakob, Stephan, Pfortmüller, Carmen |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1432-1238 |
Publisher: |
Springer |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
19 Jun 2023 16:04 |
Last Modified: |
19 Jul 2023 00:15 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1007/s00134-023-07114-8 |
PubMed ID: |
37330928 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Cognitive function Critical illness Intravenous fluid Long-term outcomes Quality of life Sepsis Septic shock |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/183516 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/183516 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |