Prevention of internal bacterial colonization of dental implants: A comparative longitudinal observational study.

Jervøe-Storm, Pia-Merete; Jepsen, Søren; Marder, Michael; Kraus, Dominik; Stoilov, Milan; Enkling, Norbert (2023). Prevention of internal bacterial colonization of dental implants: A comparative longitudinal observational study. Clinical oral implants research, 34(9), pp. 979-986. Wiley 10.1111/clr.14124

Preview

Text Clinical_Oral_Implants_Res_-_2023_-_Jerv_e_Storm_-_Prevention_of_internal_bacterial_colonization_of_dental_implants_A.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (623kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have indicated a progressive internal bacterial colonization of implants and possible implications for peri-implant bone loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate a decontamination protocol, two disinfectants, and a sealant for their ability to prevent such a colonization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial samples were harvested from the peri-implant sulcus (external) and following abutment removal from the implant cavity (internal) during routine supportive peri-implant care in 30 edentulous patients 2 years after they had obtained two implants. In a split-mouth design, implants were randomly assigned to receive either internal decontamination alone (10% H2 O2 , brush) or additional placement of either sealant (GS), disinfectant agent (CHX-varnish) or disinfectant gel (1% CHX-gel), in the internal cavity before remounting of abutment/suprastructure. Twelve months later, internal and external sampling was repeated. Total bacterial counts (TBCs) were determined using real-time PCR in a total of 240 samples (eight per patient).

RESULTS

Total bacterial counts in the internal cavity significantly reduced overall treatment modalities 1 year after the treatments (4.0 [2.3-6.9]-fold reduction; p = .000). No significant differences between the four treatment types were found (p = .348). Comparison of internal and external sampling points revealed significant correlation (R2  = .366; p = .000) with systematically higher TBC counts in external samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the use of disinfectant agents or a sealant did not show an additional benefit in the prevention of internal bacterial colonization of implants compared to a decontamination protocol alone.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

35 since deposited on 04 Jul 2023
29 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item