Which clinical and laboratory procedures should be used to fabricate digital complete dentures? A systematic review.

Thu, Khaing Myat; Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro; Yeung, Andy Wai Kan; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Lam, Walter Yu Hang (2023). Which clinical and laboratory procedures should be used to fabricate digital complete dentures? A systematic review. (In Press). The journal of prosthetic dentistry Elsevier 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.027

Preview

Text 1-s2.0-S002239132300495X-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (569kB) | Preview

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Digital workflows for digital complete denture fabrication have a variety of clinical and laboratory procedures, but their outcomes and associated complications are currently unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and laboratory procedures for digital complete dentures, their outcomes, and associated complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic literature searches were conducted on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published from January 2000 to September 2022 and screened by 2 independent reviewers. Information on digital complete denture procedures, materials, their outcomes, and associated complications was extracted.

RESULTS

Of 266 screened studies, 39 studies were included. While 26 assessed definitive complete dentures, 7 studies assessed denture bases, 2 assessed trial dentures, and 4 assessed the digital images only. Twenty-four studies used border molded impression technique, 3 studies used a facebow record, and 7 studies used gothic arch tracing. Only 13 studies performed trial denture placement. Twenty-one studies used milling, and 17 studies used 3D printing for denture fabrication. One study reported that the retention of maxillary denture bases fabricated from a border-molded impression (14.5 to 16.1 N) was statistically higher than the retention of those fabricated from intraoral scanning (6.2 to 6.6 N). The maximum occlusal force of digital complete denture wearers was similar across different fabrication procedures. When compared with the conventional workflow, digital complete dentures required statistically shorter clinical time with 205 to 233 minutes saved. Up to 37.5% of participants reported loss of retention and up to 31.3% required a denture remake. In general, ≥1 extra visit and 1 to 4 unscheduled follow-up visits were needed. The outcomes for patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life were similar between conventional, milled, and 3D-printed complete dentures.

CONCLUSIONS

Making a border-molded impression is still preferred for better retention, and trial denture placement is still recommended to optimize the fabrication of definitive digital complete dentures.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

0 since deposited on 12 Sep 2023
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item