Morton, Dean; Wismeijer, Daniel; Chen, Stephen; Hamilton, Adam; Wittneben, Julia; Casentini, Paolo; Gonzaga, Luiz; Lazarin, Rafael; Martin, William; Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro; Obermailer, Barbara; Polido, Waldemar D; Tahmaseb, Ali; Thoma, Daniel; Zembic, Anja (2023). Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols. Clinical oral implants research, 34 Suppl 26, pp. 349-356. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/clr.14137
![[img]](https://boris.unibe.ch/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Clinical_Oral_Implants_Res_-_2023_-_Morton.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (680kB) | Request a copy |
OBJECTIVES
Working Group 5 was convened to discuss and find consensus on the topics of implant placement and loading protocols associated with single missing teeth in the anterior maxilla (aesthetic zone). Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions were developed and presented to the plenary for discussion and approval.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two systematic reviews were developed and submitted prior to the conference. The group considered in detail the systematic reviews and developed statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions based on the findings of the reviews and experience of group members. Definitive versions were developed after presentation to and discussion by the plenary.
RESULTS
Five consensus statements were developed and approved from each systematic review. Twelve clinical recommendations were developed by the group based on both reviews and experience. Three patient perspectives were developed, and five suggestions made for future research.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings of the systematic reviews and experience of group members, the Type 1A protocol (immediate placement and immediate loading), when utilized in the anterior maxilla under favorable conditions, is considered predictable and is associated with high survival rates. The procedure is considered clinically viable and is associated with aesthetic outcomes, although surgical, technical, and biological complications can occur.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Review Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Wittneben, Julia, Molinero Mourelle, Pedro |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0905-7161 |
Publisher: |
Wiley-Blackwell |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
27 Sep 2023 14:18 |
Last Modified: |
28 Sep 2023 03:26 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/clr.14137 |
PubMed ID: |
37750529 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
bone implant interactions clinical assessment diagnosis loading placement prosthodontics surgical techniques |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/186633 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/186633 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |