Schimmel, Martin; Araujo, Mauricio; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Buser, Ramona; Ebenezer, Supriya; Fonseca, Manrique; Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J; Holtzman, Lucrezia Paterno; Kamnoedboon, Porawit; Levine, Robert; McKenna, Gerry; Maniewicz, Sabrina; Matarazzo, Flavia; Mattheos, Nikos; Papaspyridakos, Panos; De Souza, André Barbisan; Srinivasan, Murali; Stilwell, Charlotte; Weber, Hans Peter (2023). Group 4 ITI Consensus Report: Patient benefits following implant treatment in partially and fully edentulous patients. Clinical oral implants research, 34 Suppl 26, pp. 257-265. Wiley 10.1111/clr.14145
|
Text
Clinical_Oral_Implants_Res_-_2023_-_Schimmel.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (762kB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVES
The aim of Working Group 4 was to address patient benefits associated with implant dentistry. Focused questions on (a) dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs), (b) improvement in orofacial function, and (c) preservation of orofacial tissues in partially and fully edentulous patients following provision of implant-retained/supported dental prostheses were addressed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three systematic reviews formed the basis for discussion. Participants developed statements and recommendations determined by group consensus based on the findings of the systematic reviews. These were then presented and accepted following further discussion and modifications as required by the plenary of the 7th ITI Consensus Conference, taking place in 2023 in Lisbon, Portugal.
RESULTS
Edentulous patients wearing complete dentures (CD) experience substantial improvements in overall dPROs and orofacial function following treatment with either complete implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (CIFDP) or implant overdentures (IODs). With respect to dPROs, mandibular IODs retained by two implants are superior to IODs retained by one implant. However, increasing the number of implants beyond two, does not further improve dPROs. In fully edentulous patients, rehabilitation with CIFDP or IOD is recommended to benefit the preservation of alveolar bone and masseter muscle thickness.
CONCLUSIONS
Completely edentulous patients benefit substantially when at least the mandible is restored using an CIFDP or an IOD compared to CD. In fully edentulous patients, implant prostheses are the best option for tooth replacement. The availability of this treatment modality should be actively promoted in all edentulous communities, including those with limited access and means.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Schimmel, Martin, Abou-Ayash, Samir, Buser, Ramona, Fonseca Escalante, Manrique |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1600-0501 |
Publisher: |
Wiley |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Pubmed Import |
Date Deposited: |
27 Sep 2023 16:34 |
Last Modified: |
28 Sep 2023 03:26 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/clr.14145 |
PubMed ID: |
37750516 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
consensus report dental patient-reported outcomes meta-analysis orofacial function systematic review tertiary prevention |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/186636 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/186636 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |