Vargas‐Amado, Maria Elena; Vidondo, Beatriz; Fischer, Claude; Pisano, Simone Roberto Rolando; Grütter, Rolf (2023). Potential effect of managing connectivity to contain disease spread among free‐ranging wild boar (Sus scrofa) in disparate landscapes. Ecological solutions and evidence, 4(4) Wiley 10.1002/2688-8319.12270
|
Text
Ecol_Sol_and_Evidence_-_2023_-_Vargas_Amado_-_Potential_effect_of_managing_connectivity_to_contain_disease_spread_among.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (23MB) | Preview |
1. Landscape connectivity is a major factor shaping the spread of pathogens in wildlife
populations. By managing connectivity, transmission pathways can be broken
and disease spread be contained, particularly in the early phases of an outbreak.
Having witnessed recent outbreaks of African Swine Fever in free-ranging
wild
boar (Sus scrofa) in Belgium, Germany and Italy, offices for disease control are on
the alert also in other western European countries.
2. This study investigates the potential effect of managing landscape connectivity
to contain disease spread among free-ranging
wild boar in disparate landscapes.
It involves research into (1) the ease with which wildlife corridors can be blocked
for wild boar, (2) the connectivity of wild boar habitat and (3) the impact of landscape
fragmentation on connectivity management. This is addressed by carrying
out GIS analyses and performing graph operations on the wild boar networks in
different biogeographical regions of Switzerland.
3. The results of doing research into the three above-mentioned
objects show that,
regarding the first, most wildlife corridors are hard to block for wild boar, because
their features or location make fencing difficult. Regarding the second,
the wild boar habitat is connected. Opening wildlife passages that are currently
under construction may allow wild boar to disperse to hitherto uncolonized areas.
Regarding the third, all wild boar networks could be partially decomposed by
blocking the easy to block corridors and closing the passages. Network decomposition
would be easiest to achieve in the region where the built infrastructure is
most abundant. All over Switzerland, the potential epidemic size could be reduced
by 25% when blocking the minimal set of corridors and passages that cut the networks
to non-decomposable
components.
4. This study suggests that (a) combining connectivity analysis with fragmentation
analysis is key to explaining why a specific measure of disease containment is more
effective in one landscape than in the other, (b) complementing the permeability model with a species distribution model is essential to identify connected habitat
patches for the species of concern and (c) connectivity metrics should consider
also the surface area of occupied habitat patches and relative abundance of the
species of concern.
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |