Challenges in multi-centric generalization: phase and step recognition in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Lavanchy, Joël L; Ramesh, Sanat; Dall'Alba, Diego; Gonzalez, Cristians; Fiorini, Paolo; Müller-Stich, Beat P; Nett, Philipp C; Marescaux, Jacques; Mutter, Didier; Padoy, Nicolas (2024). Challenges in multi-centric generalization: phase and step recognition in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. (In Press). International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery Springer 10.1007/s11548-024-03166-3

[img]
Preview
Text
s11548-024-03166-3.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

PURPOSE

Most studies on surgical activity recognition utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have focused mainly on recognizing one type of activity from small and mono-centric surgical video datasets. It remains speculative whether those models would generalize to other centers.

METHODS

In this work, we introduce a large multi-centric multi-activity dataset consisting of 140 surgical videos (MultiBypass140) of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgeries performed at two medical centers, i.e., the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France (StrasBypass70) and Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland (BernBypass70). The dataset has been fully annotated with phases and steps by two board-certified surgeons. Furthermore, we assess the generalizability and benchmark different deep learning models for the task of phase and step recognition in 7 experimental studies: (1) Training and evaluation on BernBypass70; (2) Training and evaluation on StrasBypass70; (3) Training and evaluation on the joint MultiBypass140 dataset; (4) Training on BernBypass70, evaluation on StrasBypass70; (5) Training on StrasBypass70, evaluation on BernBypass70; Training on MultiBypass140, (6) evaluation on BernBypass70 and (7) evaluation on StrasBypass70.

RESULTS

The model's performance is markedly influenced by the training data. The worst results were obtained in experiments (4) and (5) confirming the limited generalization capabilities of models trained on mono-centric data. The use of multi-centric training data, experiments (6) and (7), improves the generalization capabilities of the models, bringing them beyond the level of independent mono-centric training and validation (experiments (1) and (2)).

CONCLUSION

MultiBypass140 shows considerable variation in surgical technique and workflow of LRYGB procedures between centers. Therefore, generalization experiments demonstrate a remarkable difference in model performance. These results highlight the importance of multi-centric datasets for AI model generalization to account for variance in surgical technique and workflows. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/CAMMA-public/MultiBypass140.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gastro-intestinal, Liver and Lung Disorders (DMLL) > Clinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine > Visceral Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Nett, Philipp C.

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1861-6429

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

21 May 2024 16:01

Last Modified:

21 May 2024 16:09

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s11548-024-03166-3

PubMed ID:

38761319

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Gastric bypass Multi-centric validation Multi-task temporal convolutional network Phase recognition Step recognition Surgical data science

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/196908

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/196908

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback