The Validity of Muscle Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Workup of Sarcopenia Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Stämpfli, Jessica S; Kistler-Fischbacher, Melanie; Gewiess, Jan; Bastian, Johannes Dominik; Eggimann, Anna K (2024). The Validity of Muscle Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Workup of Sarcopenia Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Clinical interventions in aging, 19, pp. 993-1003. Dovepress 10.2147/CIA.S463917

[img]
Preview
Text
CIA-463917-the-validity-of-muscle-ultrasound-in-the-diagnostic-workup-o.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (586kB) | Preview

PURPOSE

Muscle ultrasound has emerged as a promising method in the diagnostic work-up of sarcopenia. The objective of this scoping review was to explore the validity of muscle ultrasound against the latest sarcopenia definitions among older adults.

METHODS

We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. A systematic search of databases was performed by two independent reviewers. All articles comparing the performance of ultrasound to an internationally acknowledged sarcopenia definition among older adults (≥60 years) and published between 2019/01/01 (the year updated sarcopenia definitions were introduced) and 2023/11/15 were included. Data were extracted and collated by muscle and muscle parameters.

RESULTS

Out of 2290 articles screened, six studies comprising 24 validity tests among a total of 1619 older adults (mean age 74.1 years, 52.2% female) were included. The validity tests investigated the rectus femoris (n = 7), biceps brachii (n = 5), gastrocnemius medialis (n = 4), tibialis anterior (n = 4), soleus (n = 3), and rectus abdominis (n = 1). The parameter muscle thickness (MT) (n = 14) was most commonly measured. The latest European and Asian sarcopenia definitions (EWGSOP2, AWGS2) were applied as reference standards in four validity tests each. None of the studies used the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcome Consortium (SDOC) criteria. The highest area under the curve AUC (0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.94) was found for the muscle thickness of the rectus femoris muscle. Due to substantial heterogeneity among the studies, pooling of data using a meta-analytic approach was not feasible.

CONCLUSION

Limited number of studies have examined the validity of muscle ultrasound for diagnosing sarcopenia based on recent definitions among older adults. Thereby, muscle thickness of the rectus femoris showed promising results regarding validity. Further studies are needed to investigate the validity of key muscles and to validate muscle ultrasound among older hospitalized patients.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Further Contribution)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Service Sector > Institute of Pathology > Autopsy
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Orthopaedic, Plastic and Hand Surgery (DOPH) > Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Geriatric Clinic

UniBE Contributor:

Stämpfli, Jessica Sophie Meret, Gewiess, Jan, Bastian, Johannes Dominik, Eggimann, Anna

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1178-1998

Publisher:

Dovepress

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

05 Jun 2024 08:54

Last Modified:

06 Jun 2024 15:21

Publisher DOI:

10.2147/CIA.S463917

PubMed ID:

38831963

Uncontrolled Keywords:

AWGS EWGSOP POCUS SARCUS SDOC cross-sectional area geriatric assessment muscle thickness rectus femoris

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/197551

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/197551

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback