Consequences of a stay in the intensive care unit and outpatient follow-up care for chronic critically ill patients: A retrospective data analysis.

Maurer, Carol; Exl, Matthias Thomas; Gander, Hans-Peter; Bertschi, Daniela; Fischbacher, Irene; Barbezat, Isabelle; Eissler, Christian; Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen (2024). Consequences of a stay in the intensive care unit and outpatient follow-up care for chronic critically ill patients: A retrospective data analysis. (In Press). Australian critical care Elsevier 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.05.011

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S1036731424000985-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (614kB)

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic critical illness (CCI) represent a particularly vulnerable patient population with significant quality-of-life consequences and a need for follow-up care. Existing research on their quality-of-life trajectory and outpatient follow-up care is limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to (i) describe a quality improvement project focussing on patients with CCI in the Swiss setting; (ii) explain the consequences of an intensive care unit (ICU) stay for patients with CCI; and (iii) evaluate outpatient follow-up care for patients with CCI.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive mixed-methods longitudinal study used routine data from outpatient follow-up care between October 2018 and June 2022. The pre-ICU data were collected retrospectively for the week before ICU admission (baseline); prospectively at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge; and during an outpatient follow-up care at 6 months. Its main outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patients with CCI were defined as those having a ICU stay longer than 7 days.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 227 patients with outpatient follow-up care, but only 77 were analysed at all four timepoints. Their EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a median of 85 (interquartile range = 0-100) and a mean of 77.2 (standard deviation ± 23.52) before their ICU stay. Their scores had almost returned to the baseline 12 months after their ICU stay. While some reported existing restrictions in the individual HRQOL dimensions before their ICU stay, patients and their families appreciated the outpatient follow-up care including an ICU visit.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CCI have different HRQOL trajectories over time. Patients with CCI can have a good HRQOL despite their impairments; however, the HRQOL trajectories of many patients remain unclear. The focus must be on identifying the illness trajectories and on measuring and maintaining their long-term HRQOL.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic of Intensive Care

UniBE Contributor:

Gander, Hans-Peter, Bertschi, Daniela, Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen (B)

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1036-7314

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

08 Jul 2024 14:06

Last Modified:

08 Jul 2024 14:13

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.aucc.2024.05.011

PubMed ID:

38971649

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Chronic critical illness Health-related quality of life Intensive care unit Long-term outcome Post–intensive care syndrome

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/198616

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/198616

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback