Leu, Severina; von Felten, Stefanie; Fränkl, Stephan; Vassella, Erik; Vajtai, Istvan; Taylor, Elisabeth; Schulz, Marianne; Hutter, Gregor; Hench, Jürgen; Schucht, Philippe; Boulay, Jean-Louis; Mariani, Luigi (2013). IDH/MGMT-driven molecular classification of low-grade glioma is a strong predictor for long-term survival. Neuro-Oncology, 15(4), pp. 469-479. Oxford University Press 10.1093/neuonc/nos317
Full text not available from this repository.BACKGROUND
Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are rare brain neoplasms, with survival spanning up to a few decades. Thus, accurate evaluations on how biomarkers impact survival among patients with LGG require long-term studies on samples prospectively collected over a long period.
METHODS
The 210 adult LGGs collected in our databank were screened for IDH1 and IDH2 mutations (IDHmut), MGMT gene promoter methylation (MGMTmet), 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (1p19qloh), and nuclear TP53 immunopositivity (TP53pos). Multivariate survival analyses with multiple imputation of missing data were performed using either histopathology or molecular markers. Both models were compared using Akaike's information criterion (AIC). The molecular model was reduced by stepwise model selection to filter out the most critical predictors. A third model was generated to assess for various marker combinations.
RESULTS
Molecular parameters were better survival predictors than histology (ΔAIC = 12.5, P< .001). Forty-five percent of studied patients died. MGMTmet was positively associated with IDHmut (P< .001). In the molecular model with marker combinations, IDHmut/MGMTmet combined status had a favorable impact on overall survival, compared with IDHwt (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.33, P< .01), and even more so the triple combination, IDHmut/MGMTmet/1p19qloh (HR = 0.18, P< .001). Furthermore, IDHmut/MGMTmet/TP53pos triple combination was a significant risk factor for malignant transformation (HR = 2.75, P< .05).
CONCLUSION
By integrating networks of activated molecular glioma pathways, the model based on genotype better predicts prognosis than histology and, therefore, provides a more reliable tool for standardizing future treatment strategies.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Ophthalmology 04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Neurosurgery 04 Faculty of Medicine > Service Sector > Institute of Pathology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Fränkl, Stephan, Vassella, Erik, Vajtai, Istvan, Schucht, Philippe |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology |
ISSN: |
1523-5866 |
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Nicole Söll |
Date Deposited: |
09 Dec 2013 16:03 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:27 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1093/neuonc/nos317 |
PubMed ID: |
23408861 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
biomarker, brain tumor, cancer pathways, prognosis |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/39247 |