Persistent Deadlock in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Case of Doha

Dupont, Cédric; Elsig, Manfred (2012). Persistent Deadlock in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Case of Doha. In: Narlikar, Amrita; Daunton, Martin; Stern, Robert M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization (pp. 587-606). Oxford: Oxford University Press 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586103.013.0027

Text 26-OUPWTO.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (623kB)

The history of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade negotiations is full of anecdotes on missed deadlines, failed ministerial conferences, and brinkmanship situations. Tactics such as walking away from the table or sleep-depriving night sessions are legendary in the context of attempting to overcome impasse in negotiations. This article traces and explains the recurrent deadlock in the Doha Round negotiations. It identifies four structural/contextual factors – ideas, institutions, interests, and information – as necessary for understanding and anticipating potential deadlocks. The article also offers a definition of deadlock, and discusses a set of factors highlighted in the international relations literature that explain the existence and persistence of deadlock. With the help of game theory, it then illustrates the challenges faced by actors during trade negotiations. The article concludes by outlining two general scenarios for the Doha Development Agenda and discusses their implications for the World Trade Organization.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

3 since deposited on 24 Apr 2014
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item