In vitro Activity of Fosfomycin Alone and in Combination with Ceftriaxone or Azithromycin Against Clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates.

Hauser, Christoph; Hirzberger, Lea; Unemo, Magnus; Furrer, Hansjakob; Endimiani, Andrea (2014). In vitro Activity of Fosfomycin Alone and in Combination with Ceftriaxone or Azithromycin Against Clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 59(3), pp. 1605-1611. American Society for Microbiology 10.1128/AAC.04536-14

Text Hause et al. AAC-2015-final.full.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB)

New therapeutic strategies are needed to combat the emergence of infections due to multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng). In this study, fosfomycin (FOS) was tested against 89 Ng using the Etest method and showing MIC50/90s of only 8/16 μg/ml (range ≤ 1-32 μg/ml). FOS in combination with ceftriaxone (CRO) or azithromycin (AZT) was then evaluated using the checkerboard method for eight strains, including F89 (CRO-resistant) and AZT-HLR (high-level AZT-resistant). All combinations including FOS gave indifferent effects (fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] index values between 1.2-2.3 for FOS plus CRO and between 1.8-3.2 for FOS plus AZT). Time-kill experiments for FOS, CRO, AZT and their combinations (at concentrations of 0.5×, 1×, 2× and 4× MIC) were performed against ATCC 49226, one Ng of NG-MAST ST1407, F89 and AZT-HLR. For all strains, at 24 hours results indicated that: i) FOS was bactericidal at 2× MIC concentrations but after >24 hours there was re-growth of bacteria; ii) CRO was bactericidal at 0.5× MIC; iii) AZT was bactericidal at 4× MIC; iv) CRO plus AZT was less bactericidal than CRO alone; v) FOS plus AZT was bactericidal at 2× MIC; vi) CRO plus AZT and FOS plus CRO were both bactericidal at 0.5× MIC, but the latter had more rapid effects. FOS is appealing for the management of Ng infections because of its single and oral formulation. However, our results suggest its use in combination with CRO. This strategy could, after appropriate clinical trials, be implemented for the treatment of infections due to isolates possessing resistance to CRO and/or AZT.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

14 since deposited on 10 Feb 2015
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item