Collingwood on religious atonement

Jacquette, Dale (2014). Collingwood on religious atonement. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 76(2), pp. 151-170. Springer 10.1007/s11153-014-9456-3

[img] Text
art%3A10.1007%2Fs11153-014-9456-3.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (178kB) | Request a copy

R. G. Collingwood’s philosophical analysis of religious atonement as a dialectical process of mortal repentance and divine forgiveness is explained and criticized. Collingwood’s Christian concept of atonement, in which Christ TeX the Atonement (and also TeX the Incarnation), is subject in turn to another kind of dialectic, in which some of Collingwood’s leading ideas are first surveyed, and then tested against objections in a philosophical evaluation of their virtues and defects, strengths and weaknesses. Collingwood’s efforts to synthesize objective and subjective aspects of atonement, and his proposal to solve the soteriological problem as to why God becomes flesh, as a dogma of some Christian belief systems, is finally exposed in adversarial exposition as inadequately supported by one of his main arguments, designated here as Collingwood’s Dilemma. The dilemma is that sin is either forgiven or unforgiven by God. If God forgives sin, then God’s justice is lax, whereas if God does not forgive sin, then, also contrary to divine nature, God lacks perfect loving compassion. The dilemma is supposed to drive philosophy toward a concept of atonement in which the sacrifice of Christ is required in order to absolve God of the lax judgment objection. God forgives sin only when the price of sin is paid, in this case, by the suffering and crucifixion of God’s avatar. The dilemma can be resolved in another way than Collingwood considers, undermining his motivation for synthesizing objective and subjective facets of the concept of atonement for the sake of avoiding inconsistency. Collingwood is philosophically important because he asks all the right questions about religious atonement, and points toward reasonable answers, even if he does not always deliver original philosophically satisfactory solutions.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Philosophy
06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Philosophy > Theoretical Philosophy

UniBE Contributor:

Jacquette, Dale

Subjects:

100 Philosophy

ISSN:

0020-7047

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Caroline Bolz

Date Deposited:

26 Mar 2015 13:55

Last Modified:

27 Mar 2015 22:51

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s11153-014-9456-3

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.65901

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/65901

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback