Collective Referential Intentionality in the Semantics of Dialogue

Jacquette, Dale (2014). Collective Referential Intentionality in the Semantics of Dialogue. Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, 36(1), pp. 143-159. Sekcja Wydawnicza Filii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 10.2478/slgr-2014-0007

[img]
Preview
Text
slgr-2014-0007.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (190kB) | Preview

The concept of a dialogue is considered in general terms from the standpoint of its referential presuppositions. The semantics of dialogue implies that dialogue participants must generally have a collective intentionality of agreed-upon references that is minimally sufficient for them to be able to disagree about other things, and ideally for outstanding disagreements to become clearer at successive stages of the dialogue. These points are detailed and illustrated in a fictional dialogue, in which precisely these kinds of referential confusions impede progress in shared understanding. It is only through a continuous exchange of question and answer in this dialogue case study that the meanings of key terms and anaphorical references are disambiguated, and a relevantly complete collective intentionality of shared meaning between dialogue participants is achieved. The importance of a minimally shared referential semantics for the terms entering into reasoning and argument in dialogue contexts broadly construed cannot be over-estimated. Where to draw the line between referential agreement and disagreement within any chosen dialogue, as participants work toward better mutual understanding in clearing up referential incongruities, is sometimes among the dialogue’s main points of dispute.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Philosophy
06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Art and Cultural Studies > Institute of Philosophy > Theoretical Philosophy

UniBE Contributor:

Jacquette, Dale

Subjects:

100 Philosophy

ISSN:

0860-150X

Publisher:

Sekcja Wydawnicza Filii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego

Language:

English

Submitter:

Caroline Bolz

Date Deposited:

01 Apr 2015 14:58

Last Modified:

01 Apr 2015 19:36

Publisher DOI:

10.2478/slgr-2014-0007

Additional Information:

Special issue on Pragmatics and Dialectics of Argument, edited by Katarzyna Budzynska, Frans van Eemeren, and Marcin Koszowy

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.66306

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/66306

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback