Gebreselassie, Hiwot Mamo; Kaspar, Tanja; Droz, Sara Christine; Marschall, Jonas (2015). Low Yield of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening in Hemodialysis Patients: 10 Years' Experience. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 36(9), pp. 1046-1049. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/ice.2015.117
|
Text
S0899823X15001178.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (174kB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization in hemodialysis patients and to analyze the cost-effectiveness of our screening approach compared with an alternative strategy. DESIGN Screening study and cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS Analysis of twice-yearly MRSA prevalence studies conducted in the hemodialysis unit of a 950-bed tertiary care hospital from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2013. For this purpose, nasal swab samples were cultured on MRSA screening agar (mannitol-oxacillin biplate). RESULTS There were 20 mass screenings during the 10-year study period. We identified 415 patients participating in at least 1 screening, with an average of 4.5 screenings per patient. Of 415 screened patients, 15 (3.6%) were found to be MRSA carriers. The first mass screening in 2004 yielded the highest percentage of MRSA (6/101 [6%]). Only 7 subsequent screenings revealed new MRSA carriers, whereas 4 screenings confirmed previously known carriers, and 8 remained negative. None of the carriers developed MRSA bacteremia during the study period. The total cost of our screening approach, that is, screening and isolation costs, was US $93,930. The total cost of an alternative strategy (ie, no mass screening administered) would be equivalent to costs of isolation of index cases and contact tracing was estimated to be US $5,382 (difference, US $88,548). CONCLUSIONS In an area of low MRSA endemicity (<5%), regular nasal screenings of a high-risk population yielded a low rate of MRSA carriers. Twice-yearly MRSA screening of dialysis patients is unlikely to be cost-effective if MRSA prevalence is low. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;00(0):1-4.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Infectiology 04 Faculty of Medicine > Service Sector > Institute for Infectious Diseases |
UniBE Contributor: |
Gebreselassie, Hiwot Mamo, Kaspar, Tanja, Droz, Sara Christine, Marschall, Jonas |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health 500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology |
ISSN: |
0899-823X |
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Annelies Luginbühl |
Date Deposited: |
12 Jun 2015 10:14 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:47 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1017/ice.2015.117 |
PubMed ID: |
26008616 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.69191 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/69191 |