Quantifying differences in land use emission estimates implied by definition discrepancies

Stocker, Dario Bruno; Joos, F. (2015). Quantifying differences in land use emission estimates implied by definition discrepancies. Earth system dynamics, 6(2), pp. 731-744. Copernicus Publications 10.5194/esd-6-731-2015

[img]
Preview
Text
stocker15esd.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (460kB) | Preview

The quantification of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic land use and land use change (eLUC) is essential to understand the drivers of the atmospheric CO2 increase and to inform climate change mitigation policy. Reported values in synthesis reports are commonly derived from different approaches (observation-driven bookkeeping and process-modelling) but recent work has emphasized that inconsistencies between methods may imply substantial differences in eLUC estimates. However, a consistent quantification is lacking and no concise modelling protocol for the separation of primary and secondary components of eLUC has been established. Here, we review differences of eLUC quantification methods and apply an Earth System Model (ESM) of Intermediate Complexity to quantify them. We find that the magnitude of effects due to merely conceptual differences between ESM and offline vegetation model-based quantifications is ~ 20 % for today. Under a future business-as-usual scenario, differences tend to increase further due to slowing land conversion rates and an increasing impact of altered environmental conditions on land-atmosphere fluxes. We establish how coupled Earth System Models may be applied to separate secondary component fluxes of eLUC arising from the replacement of potential C sinks/sources and the land use feedback and show that secondary fluxes derived from offline vegetation models are conceptually and quantitatively not identical to either, nor their sum. Therefore, we argue that synthesis studies should resort to the "least common denominator" of different methods, following the bookkeeping approach where only primary land use emissions are quantified under the assumption of constant environmental boundary conditions.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

10 Strategic Research Centers > Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)
10 Strategic Research Centers > Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR)
08 Faculty of Science > Physics Institute > Climate and Environmental Physics

UniBE Contributor:

Stocker, Dario Bruno and Joos, Fortunat

Subjects:

500 Science > 530 Physics
500 Science > 550 Earth sciences & geology

ISSN:

2190-4979

Publisher:

Copernicus Publications

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Rätz

Date Deposited:

14 Dec 2015 11:57

Last Modified:

14 Dec 2015 11:57

Publisher DOI:

10.5194/esd-6-731-2015

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.73819

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/73819

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback