Anaesthetic induction with etomidate in cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Basciani, Reto Marco; Rindlisbacher, Antje; Begert, Esther; Brander, Luc; Jakob, Stephan; Etter, Reto; Carrel, Thierry; Eberle, Balthasar (2016). Anaesthetic induction with etomidate in cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial. European journal of anaesthesiology, 33(6), pp. 417-424. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000434

Text 00003643-900000000-98798.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (265kB)

BACKGROUND

Etomidate is perceived as preserving haemodynamic stability during induction of anaesthesia. It is also associated with adrenocortical dysfunction. The risk/benefit relationship is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypotheses that single-dose etomidate increases cumulative vasopressor requirement, time to extubation and length of stay in the ICU.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, from November 2006 to December 2009.

PATIENTS

There were 90 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) and 40 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery (MVS). Reasons for noninclusion were known adrenocortical insufficiency, use of etomidate or propofol within 1 week preoperatively, use of glucocorticoids within 6 months preoperatively, severe renal or liver dysfunction, or carotid stenosis.

INTERVENTIONS

CABG patients were allocated randomly to receive either etomidate 0.15 mg kg with placebo, propofol 1.5 mg kg with placebo or etomidate 0.15 mg kg with hydrocortisone (n = 30 in each arm). Risk stratification (low vs. high) was achieved by block randomisation. MVS patients received either etomidate 0.15 mg kg or propofol 1.5 mg kg (n = 20 in each arm).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cumulative vasopressor requirements, incidence of adrenocortical insufficiency, length of time to extubation and length of stay in ICU.

RESULTS

Cumulative vasopressor requirements 24 h after induction did not differ between treatments in patients who underwent CABG, whereas more noradrenaline was used in MVS patients following propofol induction (absolute mean difference 5.86 μg kg over 24 h P = 0.047). The incidence of relative adrenocortical insufficiency was higher after etomidate alone than propofol (CABG 83 vs. 37%, P < 0.001; MVS: 95 vs. 35%, P < 0.001). The time to extubation, length of stay in ICU and 30-day mortality did not differ among treatments. Within low and high-risk subgroups, no differences in vasopressor use or outcomes were found.

CONCLUSION

In elective cardiac surgery, laboratory indicators of etomidate-induced adrenal insufficiency do not translate into increased vasopressor requirement or inferior early outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 00415701.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 21 Mar 2016
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item