Efficacy of antidepressants over placebo is similar in two-armed versus three-armed or more-armed randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Ogawa, Yusuke; Furukawa, Toshi A; Takeshima, Nozomi; Hayasaka, Yu; Atkinson, Lauren Z; Tanaka, Shiro; Cipriani, Andrea; Salanti, Georgia (2018). Efficacy of antidepressants over placebo is similar in two-armed versus three-armed or more-armed randomized placebo-controlled trials. International clinical psychopharmacology, 33(2), pp. 66-72. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000201

Preview	Text Ogawa IntClinPsychopharmacol 2018.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (248kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Ogawa IntClinPsychopharmacol 2018_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (380kB) | Preview

Previous studies have reported that effect sizes of antidepressants were larger in two-armed than in three-armed or more-armed (multiarmed) randomized trials, where the probability of being allocated to placebo is lower. However, these studies have not taken into account the publication bias, differences among antidepressants, or covariance in multiarmed studies, or examined sponsorship bias. We searched published and unpublished randomized-controlled trials that compared placebo with 21 antidepressants for the acute treatment of major depression in adults. We calculated the ratio of odds ratios (ROR) of drug response over placebo in two-armed versus multiarmed trials for each antidepressant, and then synthesized RORs across all the included antidepressants using the multivariate meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used throughout. Two hundred and fifty-eight trials (66 two-armed and 192 multiarmed trials; 80 454 patients; 43.0% with unpublished data) were included in the present analyses. The pooled ROR for response of two-armed trials over multiarmed trials was 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.24). The ROR did not materially change between types of antidepressants, publication year, or sponsorship. The differences between two-armed versus multiarmed studies were much smaller than were suggested in previous studies and were not significant.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

433 since deposited on 15 Feb 2018
113 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item