Optimizing learning of a locomotor task: Amplifying errors as needed

Marchal Crespo, Laura; Lopez-Oloriz, Jorge; Jaeger, Lukas; Riener, Robert (6 November 2014). Optimizing learning of a locomotor task: Amplifying errors as needed. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014, pp. 5304-5307. IEEE 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944823

Text 06944823.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (5MB)

Research on motor learning has emphasized that errors drive motor adaptation. Thereby, several researchers have proposed robotic training strategies that amplify movement errors rather than decrease them. In this study, the effect of different robotic training strategies that amplify errors on learning a complex locomotor task was investigated. The experiment was conducted with a one degree-of freedom robotic stepper (MARCOS). Subjects were requested to actively coordinate their legs in a desired gait-like pattern in order to track a Lissajous figure presented on a visual display. Learning with three different training strategies was evaluated: (i) No perturbation: the robot follows the subjects' movement without applying any perturbation, (ii) Error amplification: existing errors were amplified with repulsive forces proportional to errors, (iii) Noise disturbance: errors were evoked with a randomly-varying force disturbance. Results showed that training without perturbations was especially suitable for a subset of initially less-skilled subjects, while error amplification seemed to benefit more skilled subjects. Training with error amplification, however, limited transfer of learning. Random disturbing forces benefited learning and promoted transfer in all subjects, probably because it increased attention. These results suggest that learning a locomotor task can be optimized when errors are randomly evoked or amplified based on subjects' initial skill level.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 19 Jun 2018
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item