Wismeijer, Daniel; Joda, Tim; Flügge, Tabea; Fokas, George; Tahmaseb, Ali; Bechelli, Diego; Bohner, Lauren; Bornstein, Michael; Burgoyne, Allan; Caram, Santiago; Carmichael, Robert; Chen, Chun-Yung; Coucke, Wim; Derksen, Wiebe; Donos, Nikos; El Kholy, Karim; Evans, Christopher; Fehmer, Vincent; Fickl, Stefan; Fragola, Guliano; ... (2018). Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clinical oral implants research, 29(S16), pp. 436-442. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/clr.13309
|
Text
Wismeijer_et_al-2018-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC). Download (550kB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVES
Working Group 5 was assigned the task to review the current knowledge in the area of digital technologies. Focused questions on accuracy of linear measurements when using CBCT, digital vs. conventional implant planning, using digital vs. conventional impressions and assessing the accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and patient-related outcome measurements when using s-CAIS were addressed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The literature was systematically searched, and in total, 232 articles were selected and critically reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. Four systematic reviews were produced in the four subject areas and amply discussed in the group. After emendation, they were presented to the plenary where after further modification, they were accepted.
RESULTS
Static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), in terms of pain & discomfort, economics and intraoperative complications, is beneficial compared with conventional implant surgery. When using s-CAIS in partially edentulous cases, a higher level of accuracy can be achieved when compared to fully edentulous cases. When using an intraoral scanner in edentulous cases, the results are dependent on the protocol that has been followed. The accuracy of measurements on CBCT scans is software dependent.
CONCLUSIONS
Because the precision intraoral scans and of measurements on CBCT scans and is not high enough to allow for the required accuracy, s-CAIS should be considered as an additional tool for comprehensive diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgical procedures. Flapless s-CAIS can lead to implant placement outside of the zone of keratinized mucosa and thus must be executed with utmost care.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Review Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine 04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Bornstein, Michael, El Kholy, Karim |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0905-7161 |
Publisher: |
Wiley-Blackwell |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Caroline Balz |
Date Deposited: |
27 Mar 2019 12:08 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:26 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/clr.13309 |
PubMed ID: |
30328201 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
accuracy computer-aided surgery cone beam computed tomography intraoral scans oral implantology patient-reported outcome measures |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.126136 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/126136 |