Comparing Urban Citizenship, Sanctuary Cities, Local Bureaucratic Membership, and Regularizations

Kaufmann, David (2019). Comparing Urban Citizenship, Sanctuary Cities, Local Bureaucratic Membership, and Regularizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), pp. 443-446. American Society for Public Administration 10.1111/puar.13029

Preview	Text Kaufmann 2019_preprint.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (58kB) | Preview
	Text Kaufmann 2019.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (147kB)

Irregular migrants tend to live in dense urban settings. Cities respond to this phenomenon with a variety of urban immigration and citizenship policies in support of irregular migrants. These urban policies produce a disparity between local inclusion and national exclusion. This article describes and compares such urban policies, namely urban citizenship, sanctuary cities, local bureaucratic membership, and regularizations. Urban citizenship serves as the normative foundation of these policies because it claims membership for all people that inhabit a city. Regularization programs confer a national residency status to irregular migrants. Pro-immigration actors favor this policy, however, when regularizations are not possible, cities can turn to sanctuary city and local bureaucratic membership policies. It is important for practitioners to comprehend and potentially engage with these various types of urban policies since they are likely to travel to cities worldwide.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

426 since deposited on 07 Jun 2019
135 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item