Supporting health professionals after an adverse event in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Reiser Crelier, Franziska; Schwappach, David; Schwendimann, René (2020). Supporting health professionals after an adverse event in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Swiss medical weekly, 150, w20278. EMH Schweizerischer Ärzteverlag 10.4414/smw.2020.20278

Preview

Text Reiser SwissMedWkly 2020.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (636kB) | Preview

STUDY AIM

The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of organisational structures and processes for the support of second victims in Swiss hospitals.

METHODS

To identify institutional policies and support for health professionals who have been involved in an adverse patient event and become traumatised from the event, also called second victims, we conducted a cross-sectional, multicentre survey study. We targeted Swiss acute care, university and psychiatric hospitals, as well as rehabilitation and speciality clinics. A 13-item questionnaire was used to collect information from hospital quality managers regarding their institutions’ policies and support practices with respect to second victims. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, respondents from 116 hospitals completed the questionnaire (response rate 50.2%). Most institutional respondents reported both that they would like to receive information about adverse events and that their institutions offer related support. Of participating institutions, 60% indicated that they actively inform their personnel about second-victim support possibilities; however, only 31% specifically train supervisory personnel to deliver that support, and only 32% have hospital-specific guidelines in place for second victim support. University, acute care and speciality clinics were more likely to use such guidelines than psychiatric and rehabilitation clinics. Analysis indicated an association between hospital size and the existence of guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

In Swiss hospitals, second victim support is generally prevalent, but often in an unstructured way. This lack of methodology increases the risk that, following adverse events, both the quantity and quality of support provided to health professionals will be insufficient. A firm commitment on the part of institutional leaders to implement related policies could foster the adoption of high-quality second victim guidelines in Swiss hospitals.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

148 since deposited on 07 Jul 2020
26 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item