Slavova, Nedelina; Fullerton, Heather J; Hills, Nancy K; Breiding, Philipe S; Mackay, Mark T; Steinlin, Maja (2020). Validation of the focal cerebral arteriopathy severity score (FCASS) in a Swiss cohort: Correlation with infarct volume and outcome. European journal of paediatric neurology, 28, pp. 58-63. Elsevier 10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.07.015
![[img]](https://boris.unibe.ch/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Validation_Slavova.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (859kB) | Request a copy |
BACKGROUND
Focal cerebral arteriopathy (FCA), a major cause of childhood arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), can progress and lead to increased infarct size and/or recurrent stroke. Evaluating treatment options depends on the ability to quantify reliably the degree of stenosis in FCA.
AIMS
We validated the recently introduced FCA severity score (FCASS) in an independent cohort from the Swiss Neuro-Paediatric Stroke Registry (SNPSR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We included children with FCA who had MR or CT angiography and a Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (PSOM) at 6-months and 2-years post-stroke. A paediatric neuroradiologist applied the FCASS and the modified pediatric Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), a measure of infarct volume, to all available imaging. Two senior paediatric stroke neurologists and a neuroradiology fellow independently assigned FCASS scores to test interrater reliability. Pairwise correlations between FCASS, pedASPECTS, and PSOM were examined.
RESULTS
Thirty-two children [median (IQR) age = 5.9 (1.8, 9.6), 19 males] were included. The median maximum FCASS score at any time was 9 (IQR 6, 12; range 3, 16). Larger infarct volume scores correlated with both higher maximum FCASS scores and worse post-stroke outcomes, although we found no direct correlation between FCASS and outcomes. Stroke neurologists tended to assign lower FCASS scores than the neuroradiologist, but interrater reliability was predominantly good.
CONCLUSIONS
In this independent validation cohort, higher maximum FCASS correlated with greater infarct volume scores that also correlated with worse neurological outcomes. Scoring by non-imaging specialists seems to be valuable, although differences are present.
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |