Whitehouse, Heather; Uter, Wolfgang; Geier, Johannes; Ballmer-Weber, Barbara; Bauer, Andrea; Cooper, Susan; Czarnecka-Operacz, Magdalena; Simon, Dagmar; Dickel, Heinrich; Fortina, Anna Belloni; Gallo, Rosella; Giménez-Arnau, Ana Maria; Johnston, Graham A; Filon, Francesca Laresse; Mahler, Vera; Pesonen, Maria; Rustemeyer, Thomas; Schuttelaar, Marie L A; Valiukevičienė, Skaidra; Weisshaar, Elke; ... (2021). Formaldehyde 2% is not a useful means of detecting allergy to formaldehyde releasers- results of the ESSCA network, 2015-2018. Contact dermatitis, 84(2), pp. 95-102. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/cod.13691
Text
cod.13691.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) |
BACKGROUND
Studies suggest that patch testing with formaldehyde releasers (FRs) gives significant additional information to formaldehyde 1% aq. and should be considered for addition to the European baseline series (EBS). It is not known if this is also true for formaldehyde 2% aq.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the frequency of sensitization to formaldehyde 2% aq. and co-reactivity with FRs. To establish whether there is justification for including FRs in the EBS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A 4-year, multi-center retrospective analysis of patients with positive patch test reactions to formaldehyde 2% aq. and five FRs.
RESULTS
A maximum of 15 067 patients were tested to formaldehyde 2% aq. and at least one FR. The percentage of isolated reactions to FR, without co-reactivity to, formaldehyde 2% aq. for each FR were: 46.8% for quarternium-15 1% pet.; 67.4% imidazolidinyl urea 2% pet.; 64% diazolidinyl urea 2% pet.; 83.3% 1,3-dimethylol-5, 5-dimethyl hydantoin (DMDM) hydantoin 2% pet. and 96.3% 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 0.5% pet. This demonstrates that co-reactivity varies between FRs and formaldehyde, from being virtually non-existent in 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 0.5% pet. (Cohen's kappa: 0, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02 to 0.02)], to only weak concordance for quaternium-15 [Cohen's kappa: 0.22, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.28)], where Cohen's kappa value of 1 would indicate full concordance.
CONCLUSIONS
Formaldehyde 2% aq. is an inadequate screen for contact allergy to the formaldehyde releasers, which should be considered for inclusion in any series dependant on the frequency of reactions to and relevance of each individual allergen.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Dermatology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Simon, Dagmar |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0105-1873 |
Publisher: |
Wiley-Blackwell |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Andrea Studer-Gauch |
Date Deposited: |
04 Jan 2021 14:31 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:42 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/cod.13691 |
PubMed ID: |
32876992 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol DMDM hydantoin contact allergy cosmetics diazolidinyl urea formaldehyde formaldehyde releasers imidazolidinyl urea quaternium-15 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/149453 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/149453 |