Weder, Stefan; Shoushtarian, Mehrnaz; Olivares, Virginia; Zhou, Xin; Innes-Brown, Hamish; McKay, Colette (2020). Cortical fNIRS Responses Can Be Better Explained by Loudness Percept than Sound Intensity. Ear and hearing, 41(5), pp. 1187-1195. Wolters Kluwer Health 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000836
Text
Sound_intensity_vs_loudness_perception_f.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) |
||
|
Text
Cortical_fNIRS_Responses_Can_Be_Better_Explained.12.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (927kB) | Preview |
OBJECTIVES
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a brain imaging technique particularly suitable for hearing studies. However, the nature of fNIRS responses to auditory stimuli presented at different stimulus intensities is not well understood. In this study, we investigated whether fNIRS response amplitude was better predicted by stimulus properties (intensity) or individually perceived attributes (loudness).
DESIGN
Twenty-two young adults were included in this experimental study. Four different stimulus intensities of a broadband noise were used as stimuli. First, loudness estimates for each stimulus intensity were measured for each participant. Then, the 4 stimulation intensities were presented in counterbalanced order while recording hemoglobin saturation changes from cortical auditory brain areas. The fNIRS response was analyzed in a general linear model design, using 3 different regressors: a non-modulated, an intensity-modulated, and a loudness-modulated regressor.
RESULTS
Higher intensity stimuli resulted in higher amplitude fNIRS responses. The relationship between stimulus intensity and fNIRS response amplitude was better explained using a regressor based on individually estimated loudness estimates compared with a regressor modulated by stimulus intensity alone.
CONCLUSIONS
Brain activation in response to different stimulus intensities is more reliant upon individual loudness sensation than physical stimulus properties. Therefore, in measurements using different auditory stimulus intensities or subjective hearing parameters, loudness estimates should be examined when interpreting results.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ENT) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Weder, Stefan Andreas |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0196-0202 |
Publisher: |
Wolters Kluwer Health |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Stefan Weder |
Date Deposited: |
13 Jan 2021 16:02 |
Last Modified: |
02 Mar 2023 23:34 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000836 |
PubMed ID: |
31985534 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/150343 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/150343 |