Inter-brain synchronization in the practice of Tibetan monastic debate

van Vugt, Marieke K.; Pollock, Joshua; Johnson, Bryce; Gyatso, Kalden; Norbu, Ngawang; Lodroe, Thabkhe; Gyaltsen, Thubten; Phuntsok, Lobsang; Jampa, Thakchoe; Khechok, Jampa; Jampa, Lobsang; Tenzin, Lobsang; Gyaltsen, Jampa; Moye, Amir; Fresco, David M. (2020). Inter-brain synchronization in the practice of Tibetan monastic debate. Mindfulness, 11(5), pp. 1105-1119. Springer 10.1007/s12671-020-01338-1

[img]
Preview
Text
Vugt2020_Article_Inter-brainSynchronizationInTh__1_.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

Objectives:
Although mindfulness meditation is the familiar and researched form of mental training derived from Buddhism, it represents but one form of practice. Monastic debate is an interactive and dyadic analytical meditation practice that originates from the Tibetan Buddhist tradition where monastics seek to jointly deepen their understanding of complicated philosophical issues. To date, monastic debate and analytic meditation have yet to be examined in the context of scientific investigation.

Methods:
In the current study, we examined the neural correlates of this analytical meditation practice by means of hyperscanning electroencephalography, a method well-suited for examining social interactions.

Results:
Consistent with the idea that analytical meditation helps to train concentration, we observed that over the course of the debate, mid-frontal theta oscillations—a correlate of absorption—increased significantly. This increase was stronger for more experienced monks as compared with monks at the beginning of their education. In addition, we found evidence for increases in synchrony in frontal alpha oscillations between paired debaters during moments of agreement as compared with disagreement on a set of premises.

Conclusions:
Together, these findings provide an initial understanding of Tibetan monastic debate and analytical meditation using neuroscientific methods.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Cognitive Psychology, Perception and Methodology

UniBE Contributor:

Moye, Amir Josef

Subjects:

100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology

ISSN:

1868-8527

Publisher:

Springer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Amir Josef Moye

Date Deposited:

09 Apr 2021 16:45

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:49

Publisher DOI:

10.1007/s12671-020-01338-1

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/154272

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/154272

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback