Testing the Measurement of Environmental Concern: How Do Single Items Perform in Comparison to Multi-Item Scales?

Franzen, Axel; Mader, Sebastian (2021). Testing the Measurement of Environmental Concern: How Do Single Items Perform in Comparison to Multi-Item Scales? In: Franzen, Axel; Mader, Sebastian (eds.) Research Handbook on Environmental Sociology. Research Handbooks in Sociology series. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing

[img] Text
Franzen_Mader_2021b.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (656kB)

In this chapter we assess the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a composite measure of environmental concern as it is contained in the environmental modules of the International Social Survey Programme. We follow the multitrait-multimethod approach first suggested by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and compare two instruments, environmental concern and empathy, and two methods, face-to-face personal interviewing and self-administered online surveys. Overall, 310 student volunteers participated in the study, each being interviewed twice within four to six weeks. We also compare the performance of the composite index with two single items that measure environmental concern. The study results suggest that the composite index has high reliability and high validity and outperforms any of the single-item alternatives.

Item Type:

Book Section (Book Chapter)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences
03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Sociology

UniBE Contributor:

Franzen, Axel, Mader-Eiler, Sebastian

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology

ISBN:

978-1-80037-044-9

Series:

Research Handbooks in Sociology series

Publisher:

Edward Elgar Publishing

Language:

English

Submitter:

Sebastian Mader-Eiler

Date Deposited:

07 Dec 2021 11:34

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:50

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Environmental concern; Multitrait-multimethod; Construct validity; External validity; Test-retest reliability

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/155804

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/155804

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback