‘Stretched but not Snapped’: A Response to Russell & Serban on Retiring the ‘Westminster Model’

Flinders, Matthew; Judge, David; Rhodes, R.A.W.; Vatter, Adrian (2021). ‘Stretched but not Snapped’: A Response to Russell & Serban on Retiring the ‘Westminster Model’. Government and opposition, 57(2), pp. 353-369. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/gov.2021.19

Text stretched-but-not-snapped-a-response-to-russell-and-serban-on-retiring-the-westminster-model.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (251kB) | Request a copy

This article engages with Meg Russell and Ruxandra Serban's (2021) argument that the Westminster model is ‘a concept stretched beyond repair’ that deserves ‘to be retired’. We examine the logic, theory and methods that led to such a powerful, potent and provocative argument. We suggest their approach may have inadvertently ‘muddied’ an already muddled concept. We assess the implications of ‘muddying’ for their conclusion that the Westminster model is, in essence, a dead concept in need of a decent funeral. We suggest the concept is ‘stretched but not snapped’ by developing a simple four-perspective broadening of the analytical lens. This approach aids understanding about what the concept covers, how it is operationalized and why it remains useful in comparative research

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 19 Nov 2021
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item