Edoxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation after TAVR.

Van Mieghem, Nicolas M; Unverdorben, Martin; Hengstenberg, Christian; Möllmann, Helge; Mehran, Roxana; López-Otero, Diego; Nombela-Franco, Luis; Moreno, Raul; Nordbeck, Peter; Thiele, Holger; Lang, Irene; Zamorano, José L; Shawl, Fayaz; Yamamoto, Masanori; Watanabe, Yusuke; Hayashida, Kentaro; Hambrecht, Rainer; Meincke, Felix; Vranckx, Pascal; Jin, James; ... (2021). Edoxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation after TAVR. The New England journal of medicine, 385(23), pp. 2150-2160. Massachusetts Medical Society 10.1056/NEJMoa2111016

Text Endoxaban_versus_Vit_K.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (682kB)

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) has not been well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-masked trial comparing edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists in patients with prevalent or incident atrial fibrillation as the indication for oral anticoagulation after successful TAVR. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adverse events consisting of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, or major bleeding. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. On the basis of a hierarchical testing plan, the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were tested sequentially for noninferiority, with noninferiority of edoxaban established if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio did not exceed 1.38. Superiority testing of edoxaban for efficacy would follow if noninferiority and superiority were established for major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 1426 patients were enrolled (713 in each group). The mean age of the patients was 82.1 years, and 47.5% of the patients were women. Almost all the patients had atrial fibrillation before TAVR. The rate of the composite primary efficacy outcome was 17.3 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 16.5 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.31; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). Rates of major bleeding were 9.7 per 100 person-years and 7.0 per 100 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.91; P = 0.93 for noninferiority); the difference between groups was mainly due to more gastrointestinal bleeding with edoxaban. Rates of death from any cause or stroke were 10.0 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 11.7 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mainly prevalent atrial fibrillation who underwent successful TAVR, edoxaban was noninferior to vitamin K antagonists as determined by a hazard ratio margin of 38% for a composite primary outcome of adverse clinical events. The incidence of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with vitamin K antagonists. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ENVISAGE-TAVI AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943785.).

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 21 Jan 2022
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item