Rapaliute, Egle; van Roon, Annika; van Schaik, Gerdien; Santman-Berends, Inge; Koleci, Xhelil; Mincu, Madalina; Gethmann, Jörn; Conrady, Beate; Knific, Tanja; Hodnik, Jaka Jakob; Berezowski, John; Carmo, Luis Pedro; Madouasse, Aurélien; Tarpai, Attila; Gerilovych, Anton; Malakauskas, Alvydas; Sekovska, Blagica; Fourichon, Christine; Kalaitzakis, Emmanouil; Roch, Franz-Ferdinand; ... (2021). Existence and Quality of Data on Control Programs for EU Non-regulated Cattle Diseases: Consequences for Estimation and Comparison of the Probability of Freedom From Infection. Frontiers in veterinary science, 8, p. 689375. Frontiers Media 10.3389/fvets.2021.689375
|
Text
fvets-08-689375.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (3MB) | Preview |
Some European countries have successfully implemented country-specific control programs (CPs) for infectious cattle diseases that are not regulated or are regulated only to a limited extent at the European Union (EU) level. Examples of such diseases include bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), and Johne's disease (JD). The CPs vary between countries in the design and quality of collected data as well as methods used to detect infection and estimate prevalence or probability of freedom from infection. Differences in disease status between countries and non-standardized approaches to assess freedom from infection pose a risk for countries with CPs for non-regulated diseases as infected animals may influence the progress of the disease control or eradication program. The implementation of output-based standards allows estimation and comparison of the probability of freedom for non-regulated cattle diseases in European countries. The aim of the current study was to assess the existence and quality of data that could be used for estimating freedom from infection in European countries. The online data collection tool was sent to 32 countries participating in the SOUND control COST Action and was completed by 24 countries. Data on cattle demographics and data from CPs of IBR and BVD exist in more than 50% of the response countries. However, data describing risk factors and CP of JD was reported as existing in <25% of the countries. The overall quality of data in the sections on demographics and CPs of IBR and BVD were evaluated as "good", but risk factors and JD data were mostly evaluated as "fair." Data quality was considered less good mainly due to two quality criteria: accessibility and accuracy. The results of this study show that the quantity and quality of data about cattle populations and CPs are relatively similar in many surveyed countries. The outcome of this work provides an overview of the current situation in the European countries regarding data on EU non-regulated cattle diseases and will further assist in the development and implementation of output-based standards.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
05 Veterinary Medicine > Research Foci > Veterinary Public Health / Herd Health Management 05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health (DCR-VPH) > Veterinary Public Health Institute 05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health (DCR-VPH) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Berezowski, John Andrew, Carmo, Luís Pedro |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 630 Agriculture |
ISSN: |
2297-1769 |
Publisher: |
Frontiers Media |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Susanne Agnes Lerch |
Date Deposited: |
07 Mar 2022 15:03 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 16:08 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.3389/fvets.2021.689375 |
PubMed ID: |
34350229 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
animal health data cattle control programs non-regulated diseases output-based proof of freedom |
BORIS DOI: |
10.48350/165649 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/165649 |