Group therapy for schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) should redo their meta-analysis.

Moritz, Steffen; Turner, David; Bechdolf, Andreas; Mueller, Daniel R; Woodward, Todd S; Penney, Danielle; Mehl, Stephanie (2022). Group therapy for schizophrenia: Why Burlingame et al. (2020) should redo their meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 59(2), pp. 133-135. American Psychological Association 10.1037/pst0000401

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Comments on the meta-analysis by G. M. Burlingame et al. (see record 2020-37337-001) on group therapy in schizophrenia. The commenting authors explain why they think that the meta-analysis is seriously flawed and should be recalculated and updated. First, however, they briefly reflect on the role of meta-analyses in contemporary research to emphasize that this discussion is not merely an academic debate but may have significant implications for the psychotherapeutic landscape as a whole. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Item Type:

Journal Article (Further Contribution)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > University Psychiatric Services > University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy > Translational Research Center
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Psychiatric Services > University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

UniBE Contributor:

Müller, Daniel (B)

ISSN:

0033-3204

Publisher:

American Psychological Association

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

08 Jun 2022 11:35

Last Modified:

29 Mar 2023 23:38

Publisher DOI:

10.1037/pst0000401

PubMed ID:

35666916

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/170456

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback