Time to treatment with bridging intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment:subanalysis of the randomized controlled SWIFT-DIRECT trial.

Meinel, Thomas R; Kaesmacher, Johannes; Buetikofer, Lukas; Strbian, Daniel; Eker, Omer Faruk; Cognard, Christophe; Mordasini, Pasquale; Deppeler, Sandro; Mendes Pereira, Vitor; Albucher, Jean François; Darcourt, Jean; Bourcier, Romain; Guillon, Benoit; Papagiannaki, Chrysanthi; Costentin, Guillaume; Sibolt, Gerli; Räty, Silja; Gory, Benjamin; Richard, Sébastien; Liman, Jan; ... (2023). Time to treatment with bridging intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment:subanalysis of the randomized controlled SWIFT-DIRECT trial. Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 15(e1), e102-e110. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/jnis-2022-019207

Preview

Text Meinel_JNeurointervSurg_2023.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (4MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that treatment delays might be an effect modifier regarding risks and benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS

We used the dataset of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial, which randomized 408 patients to IVT+MT or MT alone. Potential interactions between assignment to IVT+MT and expected time from onset-to-needle (OTN) as well as expected time from door-to-needle (DTN) were included in regression models. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included mRS shift, mortality, recanalization rates, and (symptomatic) intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours.

RESULTS

We included 408 patients (IVT+MT 207, MT 201, median age 72 years (IQR 64-81), 209 (51.2%) female). The expected median OTN and DTN were 142 min and 54 min in the IVT+MT group and 129 min and 51 min in the MT alone group. Overall, there was no significant interaction between OTN and bridging IVT assignment regarding either the functional (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.30) and safety outcomes or the recanalization rates. Analysis of in-hospital delays showed no significant interaction between DTN and bridging IVT assignment regarding the dichotomized functional outcome (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.62), but the shift and mortality analyses suggested a greater benefit of IVT when in-hospital delays were short.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that the effect of bridging IVT on functional independence is modified by overall or in-hospital treatment delays. Considering its low power, this subgroup analysis could have missed a clinically important effect, and exploratory analysis of secondary clinical outcomes indicated a potentially favorable effect of IVT with shorter in-hospital delays. Heterogeneity of the IVT effect size before MT should be further analyzed in individual patient meta-analysis of comparable trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03192332.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

260 since deposited on 02 Aug 2022
39 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item