Does the definition of preventable emergency department visit matter? An empirical analysis using 20 million visits in Ontario and Alberta.

Lau, Tammy; Maltby, Alana; Ali, Shehzad; Moran, Valérie; Wilk, Piotr (2022). Does the definition of preventable emergency department visit matter? An empirical analysis using 20 million visits in Ontario and Alberta. Academic emergency medicine, 29(11), pp. 1329-1337. Wiley 10.1111/acem.14587

Preview	Text Academic_Emergency_Medicine_-_2022_-_Lau_-_Does_the_definition_of_preventable_emergency_department_visit_matter_An.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (797kB) | Preview
	Text Lau_AcadEmergMed_2022.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (450kB)

OBJECTIVES

This study had two objectives: (1) to estimate the prevalence of preventable emergency department (ED) visits during the 2016-2020 time-period among those living in 19 large urban centres in Alberta and Ontario, Canada; and (2) to assess if the definition of preventable ED visits matters in estimating the prevalence.

METHODS

A retrospective, population-based study of ED visits that were reported to the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2020 was conducted. Preventable ED visits were operationalized based on the following approaches: (1) Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), (2) Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC), (3) Family Practice Sensitive Conditions (FPSC), and (4) Sentinel Non-Urgent Conditions (SNC). The overall proportion of ED visits that were preventable was estimated. We also estimated the adjusted relative risks (RRs) of preventable ED visits by patients' sex and age, fiscal year (FY), province of residence, and census metropolitan area (CMA) of residence.

RESULTS

There were 20,171,319 ED visits made by 8,919,618 patients ages 1 to 74 who resided in one of the 19 CMAs in Alberta or Ontario. On average, there were 2.26 visits per patient over the period of four fiscal years; most patients made one (44.22%) or two ED visits (20.72%). The overall unadjusted prevalence of preventable ED visits varied by definition; 35.33% of ED visits were defined as preventable based on CTAS, 12.88% based on FPSC, 3.41% based on SNC, and 2.33% based on ACSC.

CONCLUSION

There is a substantial level of variation in prevalence estimates across definitions of preventable ED visits, and care should be taken when interpreting these estimates as each has a different meaning and may lead to different conclusions. The conceptualization and measurement of preventable ED visits is complex, multi-faceted, and may not be adequately captured by a single definition.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

73 since deposited on 02 Sep 2022
72 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item