Sex Differences in Safety and Effectiveness of LAAO: Insights From the Amulet IDE Trial.

Alkhouli, Mohamad; Russo, Andrea M; Thaler, David; Windecker, Stephan; Anderson, Jordan A; Gage, Ryan; Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya (2022). Sex Differences in Safety and Effectiveness of LAAO: Insights From the Amulet IDE Trial. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 15(21), pp. 2143-2155. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.037

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S1936879822013413-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

Women have higher rates of acute complications after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, data on long-term safety and effectiveness are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine sex-specific short- and long-term outcomes after LAAO in the Amulet IDE (Amplatzer™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder) trial.

METHODS

The following outcomes were compared between men and women: in-hospital complications, device-related outcomes (peridevice leak at 45 days and device-related thrombus at 18 months), and long-term clinical outcomes (death, thromboembolism, and bleeding). Subanalyses for the interaction between sex and device type were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,833 patients underwent attempted device implantation (917 with the Amulet and 916 with the Watchman), of whom 734 were women (40%). Device success was 97.4% in men and 97.1% in women (P = 0.60). Rates of major in-hospital adverse events were higher in women (4.4% vs 1.9%; P < 0.01), driven by major bleeding (3.7% vs 1.0%; P < 0.01) and pericardial effusion requiring intervention (2.0% vs 0.5%; P < 0.01). Peridevice leak and device-related thrombus were similar in men and women (18.3% vs 18.9% [P = 0.78] and 3.3% vs 5.0% [P = 0.10], respectively). There were no differences between men and women in rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (2.6% vs 2.6%; P = 0.98), transient ischemic attack (1.3% vs 1.6%; P = 0.69), hemorrhagic stroke (0.5% vs 0.4%; P = 0.88), major bleeding (10.1% vs 10.9%; P = 0.49), cardiovascular death (4.3% vs 3.5%; P = 0.45), or all-cause death (8.9% vs 6.9%; P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

In the Amulet IDE trial, long-term clinical outcomes including effectiveness following LAAO were comparable in men and women despite the higher rates of in-hospital complications due to major bleeding and pericardial effusion in women. (Amplatzer™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder Trial [Amulet IDE]; NCT02879448).

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Windecker, Stephan

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1876-7605

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

15 Nov 2022 09:12

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 16:28

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jcin.2022.06.037

PubMed ID:

36357018

Uncontrolled Keywords:

atrial fibrillation left atrial appendage occlusion sex differences stroke

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/174721

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/174721

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback