A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Caries Prevention following the AGREE II Checklist.

Lamloum, Demetrio; Arghittu, Antonella; Ferrara, Pietro; Castiglia, Paolo; Dettori, Marco; Gaeta, Maddalena; Odone, Anna; Campus, Guglielmo (2023). A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Caries Prevention following the AGREE II Checklist. Healthcare, 11(13) MDPI 10.3390/healthcare11131895

[img]
Preview
Text
healthcare-11-01895-v2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (686kB) | Preview

Untreated oral diseases are detrimental to overall well-being and quality of life and are in close relationship with social and economic consequences. The presence of strong evidence for caries primary and secondary prevention is a compulsory tool for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This paper was aimed to assess systematically the importance of clinical practice guidelines in caries prevention management considering both the adult and pediatric populations and evaluate them using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Checklist. Records were extracted from EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline and seven other relevant guideline databases between 6 January and 14 February 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted the appraisal using the web-based platform My AGREE PLUS. Twenty-one guidelines/papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Eight CPGs included both primary and secondary prevention interventions, whereas thirteen presented a single preventive model. Overall, 12 guidelines were published in the USA. The mean AGREE II scores ranged from 35.4% to 84.3%. Of the total twenty-one included guidelines, twelve were classified as "Recommended", ranging from 56.3% to 84.3%, the others were described as "Recommended with modification", ranging from 35.4% to 68.9%. From the AGREE II analysis carried out, the CPGs included in this survey adopted a punctual methodological rigor but lacked applicative power. The present survey showed that the public, as the primary beneficiary, played a limited role in the development of the twenty-one CPGs. Hence, methodological improvement can better support high-quality CPG development in the future.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry

UniBE Contributor:

Campus, Guglielmo Giuseppe

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2227-9032

Publisher:

MDPI

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

17 Jul 2023 12:41

Last Modified:

18 Jul 2023 09:28

Publisher DOI:

10.3390/healthcare11131895

PubMed ID:

37444729

Uncontrolled Keywords:

AGREE II evidence-based dentistry guidelines public health dentistry

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/184849

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/184849

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback