Adapting a practical EPR dosimetry protocol to measure output factors in small fields with alanine.

Höfel, Sebastian; Liebig, Pauline; Fix, Michael K; Drescher, Malte; Zwicker, Felix (2023). Adapting a practical EPR dosimetry protocol to measure output factors in small fields with alanine. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 24(12), e14191. American Association of Physicists in Medicine 10.1002/acm2.14191

[img]
Preview
Text
J_Applied_Clin_Med_Phys_-_2023_-_H_fel_-_Adapting_a_practical_EPR_dosimetry_protocol_to_measure_output_factors_in_small.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (966kB) | Preview

PURPOSE

Modern radiotherapy techniques often deliver small radiation fields. In this work, a practical Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry protocol is adapted and applied to measure output factors (OF) in small fields of a 6 MV radiotherapy system. Correction factors and uncertainties are presented and OFs are compared to the values obtained by following TRS-483 using an ionization chamber (IC).

METHODS

Irradiations were performed at 10 cm depth inside a water phantom positioned at 90 cm source to surface distance with a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam of a Halcyon radiotherapy system. OFs for different nominal field sizes (1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, normalized to 10 × 10 cm2 ) were determined with a PinPoint 3D (PTW 31022) IC following TRS-483 as well as with alanine pellets with a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 2.4 mm. EPR readout was performed with a benchtop X-band spectrometer. Correction factors due to volume averaging and due to positional uncertainties were derived from 2D film measurements.

RESULTS

OFs obtained from both dosimeter types agreed within 0.7% after applying corrections for the volume averaging effect. For the used alanine pellets, volume averaging correction factors of 1.030(2) for the 1 × 1 cm2 field and <1.002 for the larger field sizes were determined. The correction factor for positional uncertainties of 1 mm was in the order of 1.018 for the 1 × 1 cm2 field. Combined relative standard uncertainties uc for the OFs resulting from alanine measurements were estimated to be below 1.5% for all field sizes. For IC measurements, uc was estimated to be below 1.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

A practical EPR dosimetry protocol is adaptable for precisely measuring OFs in small fields down to 1 × 1 cm2 . It is recommended to consider the effect of positional uncertainties for field sizes <2 × 2 cm2 .

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Radiation Oncology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Radiation Oncology > Medical Radiation Physics

UniBE Contributor:

Fix, Michael

Subjects:

500 Science > 530 Physics
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1526-9914

Publisher:

American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

06 Nov 2023 09:47

Last Modified:

02 Dec 2023 00:16

Publisher DOI:

10.1002/acm2.14191

PubMed ID:

37922380

Uncontrolled Keywords:

EPR dosimetry alanine density effect output factor small field volume effect

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/188577

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/188577

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback