Prognostic significance of lymph nodes assessment during pulmonary metastasectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minervini, Fabrizio; Li, Allen; Qu, Marianna; Nilius, Henning; Shargall, Yaron (2023). Prognostic significance of lymph nodes assessment during pulmonary metastasectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of thoracic disease, 15(12), pp. 6447-6458. AME Publishing Company 10.21037/jtd-23-769

[img]
Preview
Text
81091-PB4-3577-R2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (2MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Lung metastasectomy is an accepted treatment modality worldwide. Whether the addition of lymph node dissection to the procedure is useful remains, however, unknown.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature analyzing MEDLINE, Embase, until 31st October 2021. We included all studies which met the inclusion criteria aiming to determine if the addition of lymph node tissue dissection/sampling to lung metastasectomy offers survival benefits when compared to patients who do receive lymph node tissue dissection. Secondary outcomes were 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Each study was assessed for risk of bias. The data collected from the included studies were pooled using reconstruction of individual-level patient data and pooling of reported 5-year odds ratios (ORs). Interstudy heterogeneity was estimated with visual inspection of forest plots and calculation of the I2 inconsistency statistic.

RESULTS

We found 11 eligible studies that included a total of 3,310 patients. The most common primary tumor type was colorectal cancer (1,740 patients) and the most commonly performed operative procedure was wedge resection (57%) followed by lobectomy (39%). When resection status was reported, R0 resection was achieved in 90% of the cases. Nine studies did not show a statistically significant effect of lymph nodes dissection or sampling on the 5-year OS with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 1.08; I2=26%; 95% prediction interval (PI): 0.70, 1.24]. Regarding DFS, the pooled HR 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.80; I2=31%; 95% PI: 0.12, 2.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of lymph node tissue dissection during lung metastasectomy was not associated with a significant benefit in OS and showed a slight tendency towards a better DFS.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Institute of Clinical Chemistry

UniBE Contributor:

Nilius, Henning Jürgen Jean

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

2077-6624

Publisher:

AME Publishing Company

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

22 Jan 2024 17:24

Last Modified:

22 Jan 2024 17:33

Publisher DOI:

10.21037/jtd-23-769

PubMed ID:

38249914

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Lung metastasectomy lung metastases lymphadenectomy

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/191983

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/191983

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback