The More Sophisticated, the More Biased? Testing a New Measure of Political Sophistication on Biased Information Processing

Valli, Chiara; Eugster, Beatrice; Arlt, Dorothee (2023). The More Sophisticated, the More Biased? Testing a New Measure of Political Sophistication on Biased Information Processing. International journal of public opinion research, 35(4) Oxford University Press 10.1093/ijpor/edad037

[img] Text
Valli_et_al.__2023.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (418kB)

According to literature, biased information processing increases with political sophistication. The logic behind this relationship is that political sophisticates possess greater cognitive skills and knowledge to defend their prior beliefs. Although political sophistication can be understood as a multidimensional concept, existing research primarily uses general political knowledge as a proxy to assess it. Therefore, we introduce a more rigorous measure of sophistication that gauges individuals’ ability to justify their attitudes with substantive and well-elaborated arguments and put the classic measure of political sophistication to a test. We study these mechanisms in a direct-democratic setting via an online survey, in which 898 Swiss-German voters are exposed to a tailored counterargument on a political referendum. Our results indicate that individuals with higher levels of sophistication evaluate counter-attitudinal information less favorably and hold more stable opinions. While we did not find support for the hypothesis that sophistication leads to selective exposure to consonant information, our analysis points to a reverse mechanism: individ- uals with lower levels of sophistication exhibit a higher likelihood of exposure to dissonant views. Notably, these results align with the trends reported for general political knowledge and corroborate the validity of using general political knowledge as a proxy for political sophistication.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Communication and Media Studies (ICMB)

UniBE Contributor:

Valli, Chiara Lisa, Eugster, Beatrice

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 380 Commerce, communications & transportation

ISSN:

0954-2892

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Funders:

[UNSPECIFIED] Förderverein Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft der Universität Bern

Language:

English

Submitter:

Chiara Lisa Valli

Date Deposited:

26 Jan 2024 15:35

Last Modified:

26 Jan 2024 15:35

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/ijpor/edad037

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Biased Information Processing; Motivated Reasoning; Political Sophistication

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/192149

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/192149

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback