Ipekci, Aziz Mert; Filsinger, Maximilian; Buitrago-Garcia, Diana; Kobler Betancourt, Cristopher I.; Frahsa, Annika; Low, Nicola (2024). Polarization and health-related behaviours and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol. F1000Research, 13 F1000 Research Ltd 10.12688/f1000research.145852.1
|
Text
91522a86-d79b-447b-bdad-0373bab688ab_145852_-_aziz_mert_ipekci.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (673kB) | Preview |
INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic affected people's health behaviours and health outcomes. Political or affective polarization could be associated with health behaviours such as mask-wearing or vaccine uptake and with health outcomes, e.g., infection or mortality rate. Political polarization relates to divergence or spread of ideological beliefs and affective polarization is about dislike between people of different political groups, such as ideologies or parties. The objectives of this study are to investigate and synthesize evidence about associations between both forms of polarization and COVID-19 health behaviours and outcomes.
METHODS
In this systematic review, we will include quantitative studies that assess the relationship between political or affective polarization and COVID-19-related behaviours and outcomes, including adherence to mask mandates, vaccine uptake, infection and mortality rate. We will use a predetermined strategy to search EMBASE, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Library, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Global Health (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, EconLit (EBSCOhost), WHO COVID-19 Database, iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio (NIH) and Google Scholar from 2019 to September 8 2023. One reviewer will screen unique records according to eligibility criteria. A second reviewer will verify the selection. Data extraction, using pre-piloted electronic forms, will follow a similar process. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the JBI checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. We will summarise the included studies descriptively and examine the heterogeneity between studies. Quantitative data pooling might not be feasible due to variations in measurement methods used to evaluate exposure, affective and political polarization. If there are enough relevant studies for statistical data synthesis, we will conduct a meta-analysis.
DISCUSSION
This review will help to better understand the concept of polarization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and might inform decision making for future pandemics.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO ID: CRD42023475828.
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |