Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism for psychosis: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human data.

Siafis, Spyridon; Chiocchia, Virginia; Macleod, Malcolm R; Austin, Charlotte; Homiar, Ava; Tinsdeall, Francesca; Friedrich, Claire; Ramage, Fiona J; Kennett, Jaycee; Nomura, Nobuyuki; Maksym, Olena; Rutigliano, Grazia; Vano, Luke J; McCutcheon, Robert A; Gilbert, David; Ostinelli, Edoardo G; Stansfield, Claire; Dehdarirad, Hossein; Juma, Damian Omari; Wright, Simonne; ... (2024). Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism for psychosis: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of human and non-human data. Wellcome open research, 9 Wellcome Trust 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21302.1

[img]
Preview
Text
7a914f07-9a20-480d-be13-0043a4233336_21302_-_spyridon_siafis__1_.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (3MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonism shows promise for treating psychosis, prompting us to synthesise data from human and non-human studies.

METHODS

We co-produced a living systematic review of controlled studies examining TAAR1 agonists in individuals (with or without psychosis/schizophrenia) and relevant animal models. Two independent reviewers identified studies in multiple electronic databases (until 17.11.2023), extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes were standardised mean differences (SMD) for overall symptoms in human studies and hyperlocomotion in animal models. We also examined adverse events and neurotransmitter signalling. We synthesised data with random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Nine randomised trials provided data for two TAAR1 agonists (ulotaront and ralmitaront), and 15 animal studies for 10 TAAR1 agonists. Ulotaront and ralmitaront demonstrated few differences compared to placebo in improving overall symptoms in adults with acute schizophrenia (N=4 studies, n=1291 participants; SMD=0.15, 95%CI: -0.05, 0.34), and ralmitaront was less efficacious than risperidone (N=1, n=156, SMD=-0.53, 95%CI: -0.86, -0.20). Large placebo response was observed in ulotaront phase-III trials. Limited evidence suggested a relatively benign side-effect profile for TAAR1 agonists, although nausea and sedation were common after a single dose of ulotaront. In animal studies, TAAR1 agonists improved hyperlocomotion compared to control (N=13 studies, k=41 experiments, SMD=1.01, 95%CI: 0.74, 1.27), but seemed less efficacious compared to dopamine D 2 receptor antagonists (N=4, k=7, SMD=-0.62, 95%CI: -1.32, 0.08). Limited human and animal data indicated that TAAR1 agonists may regulate presynaptic dopaminergic signalling.

CONCLUSIONS

TAAR1 agonists may be less efficacious than dopamine D 2 receptor antagonists already licensed for schizophrenia. The results are preliminary due to the limited number of drugs examined, lack of longer-term data, publication bias, and assay sensitivity concerns in trials associated with large placebo response. Considering their unique mechanism of action, relatively benign side-effect profile and ongoing drug development, further research is warranted.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-ID: CRD42023451628.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Chiocchia, Virginia, Tonia, Thomai, Egger, Matthias, Salanti, Georgia

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2398-502X

Publisher:

Wellcome Trust

Language:

English

Submitter:

Pubmed Import

Date Deposited:

22 Jul 2024 17:06

Last Modified:

22 Jul 2024 17:15

Publisher DOI:

10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21302.1

PubMed ID:

39036710

Additional Information:

Georgia Salanti and Stefan Leucht contributed equally.

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Antipsychotics TAAR1 clinical trials living evidence meta-analysis preclinical studies schizophrenia systematic review

BORIS DOI:

10.48350/199132

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/199132

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback