Krause, Merton; Lutz, Wolfgang (2006). How we really ought to be comparing treatments for clinical purposes. Psychotherapy, 43(3), pp. 359-361. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association 10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.359
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Without having disaggregated clinical trial comparison groups in terms of their various different outcome-relevant sorts of cases, researchers are forced to choose treatments for subsequent individual patients on only the evidence of outcome comparisons between groups of unknown and probably unequal mixes of various differently outcome-relevant sorts of prior cases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Lutz, Wolfgang |
ISSN: |
0033-3204 |
Publisher: |
American Psychological Association |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Factscience Import |
Date Deposited: |
04 Oct 2013 14:48 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 14:14 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.359 |
PubMed ID: |
22122107 |
Web of Science ID: |
000240852600015 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/19957 (FactScience: 3036) |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |