Does diagnostic delay result in decreased survival in paediatric brain tumours?

Kukal, Karel; Dobrovoljac, Milana; Boltshauser, Eugen; Ammann, Roland A; Grotzer, Michael A (2009). Does diagnostic delay result in decreased survival in paediatric brain tumours? European journal of pediatrics, 168(3), pp. 303-10. Berlin: Springer 10.1007/s00431-008-0755-5

Preview

Text Kukal2009_Article_DoesDiagnosticDelayResultInDec.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (194kB) | Preview

To study the hypothesis that a delay in the diagnosis of paediatric brain tumours results in decreased survival outcome probability, we compared the prediagnostic period of 315 brain tumour patients (median age 6.7 years, range, 0 to 16 years) with progression-free and overall survival. The median prediagnostic symptomatic interval was 60 days (range, 0 to 3,480 days), with a median parental delay of 14 days (range, 0 to 1,835 days) and a median doctor's delay of 14 days (range, 0 to 3,480 days). The prediagnostic symptomatic interval correlated significantly with the patient age, tumour histology, tumour location and year of diagnosis, but not with gender. We then grouped the patients according to histology (low-grade glioma [n=77], medulloblastoma [n=57], high-grade glioma [n=40], craniopharyngioma [n=27], ependymoma [n=20] and germ cell tumours [n=18]). Contrary to common belief, long prediagnostic symptomatic interval or long doctor's delay did not result in decreased survival outcome probability in any of these groups. The effect of tumour biology on survival seems to be dominant and overwhelms any possible opposing effect on survival of a delay in diagnosis.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

73 since deposited on 04 Oct 2013
29 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item