Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments

Reber, Rolf; Wurtz, Pascal; Knapstad, Marit; Lervik, Linn Vathne (2010). Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17(2), pp. 219-223. New York, N.Y.: Springer 10.3758/PBR.17.2.219

Preview

Text art_10.3758_PBR.17.2.219.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (97kB) | Preview

When asked which of two digits is greater, participants respond more quickly if physical size corresponds to number magnitude, such as in 3 7, than when the two attributes contradict each other, such as in 3 7. This size congruence effect in comparative number judgments is a well-documented phenomenon. We extended existing findings by showing that this effect does not depend on physical size of the number alone but can be observed with number symmetry. In addition, we observed that symmetric numbers are judged as being smaller than asymmetric numbers, which renders an interpretation of the number symmetry congruence effect in terms of physical size implausible. We refer to the polarity correspondence principle (Proctor & Cho, 2006) to explain the present findings.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

27 since deposited on 17 Feb 2014
10 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item