Variability between laboratories performing coagulation tests with identical platforms: a nationwide evaluation study.

Nagler, Michael; Bachmann, Lucas M.; Alberio, Lorenzo; Angelillo, Anne; Asmis, Lars M.; Korte, Wolfgang; Mendez, Adriana; Reber, Guido; Stricker, Hans; Tsakiris, Dimitrios A.; Wuillemin, Walter A. (2013). Variability between laboratories performing coagulation tests with identical platforms: a nationwide evaluation study. Thrombosis journal, 11(1), p. 6. BioMed Central 10.1186/1477-9560-11-6

Preview

Text 2013 Thromb J_Variability between laboratories.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (187kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

While the assessment of analytical precision within medical laboratories has received much attention in scientific enquiry, the degree of as well as the sources causing variation between them remains incompletely understood. In this study, we quantified the variance components when performing coagulation tests with identical analytical platforms in different laboratories and computed intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) for each coagulation test.

METHODS

Data from eight laboratories measuring fibrinogen twice in twenty healthy subjects with one out of 3 different platforms and single measurements of prothrombin time (PT), and coagulation factors II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI and XIII were analysed. By platform, the variance components of (i) the subjects, (ii) the laboratory and the technician and (iii) the total variance were obtained for fibrinogen as well as (i) and (iii) for the remaining factors using ANOVA.

RESULTS

The variability for fibrinogen measurements within a laboratory ranged from 0.02 to 0.04, the variability between laboratories ranged from 0.006 to 0.097. The ICC for fibrinogen ranged from 0.37 to 0.66 and from 0.19 to 0.80 for PT between the platforms. For the remaining factors the ICC's ranged from 0.04 (FII) to 0.93 (FVIII).

CONCLUSIONS

Variance components that could be attributed to technicians or laboratory procedures were substantial, led to disappointingly low intraclass correlation coefficients for several factors and were pronounced for some of the platforms. Our findings call for sustained efforts to raise the level of standardization of structures and procedures involved in the quantification of coagulation factors.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

237 since deposited on 23 May 2014
20 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item