Neutral biodiversity theory can explain the imbalance of phylogenetic trees but not the tempo of their diversification

Davies, T. Jonathan; Allen, Andrew P.; Borda-de-Água, Luís; Regetz, Jim; Melian Penate, Carlos Javier (2011). Neutral biodiversity theory can explain the imbalance of phylogenetic trees but not the tempo of their diversification. Evolution, 65(7), pp. 1841-1850. Wiley 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01265.x

Text melian_davis.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (897kB) | Request a copy

Numerous evolutionary studies have sought to explain the distribution of diversity across the limbs of the tree of life. At the same time, ecological studies have sought to explain differences in diversity and relative abundance within and among ecological communities. Traditionally, these patterns have been considered separately, but models that consider processes operating at the level of individuals, such as neutral biodiversity theory (NBT), can provide a link between them. Here, we compare evolutionary dynamics across a suite of NBT models. We show that NBT can yield phylogenetic tree topologies with imbalance closely resembling empirical observations. In general, metacommunities that exhibit greater disparity in abundance are characterized by more imbalanced phylogenetic trees. However, NBT fails to capture the tempo of diversification as represented by the distribution of branching events through time. We suggest that population-level processes might therefore help explain the asymmetry of phylogenetic trees, but that tree shape might mislead estimates of evolutionary rates unless the diversification process is modeled explicitly.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 05 Sep 2014
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item