Aspiration Thrombectomy for Treatment of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a Meta-analysis of 26 Randomized Trials in 11 943 Patients.

Spitzer, Ernest; Heg, Dik; Stefanini, Giulio G; Stortecky, Stefan; Rutjes, Anne W S; Räber, Lorenz; Blöchlinger, Stefan; Pilgrim, Thomas; Jüni, Peter; Windecker, Stephan (2015). Aspiration Thrombectomy for Treatment of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a Meta-analysis of 26 Randomized Trials in 11 943 Patients. Revista española de cardiología - English Edition, 68(9), pp. 746-752. Elsevier Doyma 10.1016/j.rec.2015.01.007

[img] Text
Spitzer RevEspCardiol(EnglEd) 2015.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (361kB)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is continued debate about the routine use of aspiration thrombectomy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Our aim was to evaluate clinical and procedural outcomes of aspiration thrombectomy-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with conventional primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials with a total of 11 943 patients. Clinical outcomes were extracted up to maximum follow-up and random effect models were used to assess differences in outcomes.

RESULTS

We observed no difference in the risk of all-cause death (pooled risk ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.04; P = .124), reinfarction (pooled risk ratio = 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.08; P = .176), target vessel revascularization (pooled risk ratio = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.00; P = .052), or definite stent thrombosis (pooled risk ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.16; P = .202) between the 2 groups at a mean weighted follow-up time of 10.4 months. There were significant reductions in failure to reach Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow (pooled risk ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.81; P < .001) or myocardial blush grade 3 (pooled risk ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.89; P = .001), incomplete ST-segment resolution (pooled risk ratio = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.84; P < .001), and evidence of distal embolization (pooled risk ratio = 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.81; P = .001) with aspiration thrombectomy but estimates were heterogeneous between trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Among unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, aspiration thrombectomy-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention does not improve clinical outcomes, despite improved epicardial and myocardial parameters of reperfusion. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Department of Clinical Research (DCR)

UniBE Contributor:

Heg, Dierik Hans, Stefanini, Giulio, Stortecky, Stefan, Rutjes, Anne, Räber, Lorenz, Blöchlinger, Stefan, Pilgrim, Thomas, Jüni, Peter, Windecker, Stephan

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1885-5857

Publisher:

Elsevier Doyma

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

27 May 2015 11:03

Last Modified:

20 Feb 2024 14:17

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.rec.2015.01.007

PubMed ID:

25979551

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Aspiración de trombo; Infarto de miocardio; Meta-analysis; Metanálisis; Myocardial infarction; Thrombus-aspiration

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.69153

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/69153

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback